Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Cap\s+for\s+inverted\-L\.\.\.\s+\-Reply\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Cap\s+for\s+inverted\-L\.\.\.\s+\-Reply\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: Cap for inverted-L... -Reply (score: 1): Author: TOUSSAINTM@yankeegas.com (MARK TOUSSAINT); Date: Wed, 08 Jan 1997 16:21:03 -0500; Glenn; Remember that adding length to the inverted L will help, but most important is that the vertical portion be as long as possible. All you'll be doing by adding length to the horizontal portion; /archives//html/Topband/1997-01/msg00169.html (9,174 bytes)
2. TopBand: Cap for inverted-L... -Reply (score: 1): Author: hwardsil@wolfenet.com (Ward Silver); Date: Thu, 9 Jan 1997 07:27:18 -0800 (PST); Not completely true - by adding horizontal length *beyond a quarter-wave*, the current maximum is moved "up" the vertical section. If the wire was one-half wavelength long, for example, the current m; /archives//html/Topband/1997-01/msg00176.html (8,258 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]