Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+CW\s+segment\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+CW\s+segment\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: CW segment (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Tue, 07 Apr 1998 08:04:19 +0000; I think it's about time we all got together and asked for a CW segment. That would at least eliminate the SSB ops who QRM DX. Did anything ever happen out of the last push? I asked the SE director, a; /archives//html/Topband/1998-04/msg00062.html (7,211 bytes)
2. TopBand: CW segment (score: 1): Author: n7ex@athenet.net (Dave_K9NX); Date: Tue, 07 Apr 1998 12:24:28 +0100; Tom The last time this went around as I recall over 70% of the respondents replied that they favor a dedicated CW sub band for 160M. Of course there was some debate about where the upper end should b; /archives//html/Topband/1998-04/msg00065.html (8,259 bytes)
3. TopBand: CW segment (score: 1): Author: btippett@CTC.Net (Bill Tippett); Date: Tue, 07 Apr 1998 08:26:46 -0400 (EDT); Tom and all: We tried that last year! I got more than 128 responses (including W8JI BTW!) to a survey regarding a bandplan, I sent the results to K1KI who is a Director and exactly nothing has happen; /archives//html/Topband/1998-04/msg00066.html (8,398 bytes)
4. TopBand: CW segment (score: 1): Author: jbmitch@vt.edu (John Mitchell); Date: Tue, 07 Apr 1998 14:05:25 -0400; I don't know, but I'll try to find out. Interestingly, this subject (a CW-only allocation for 160) was brought up for discussion at the time at one of the large contest club meetings, and the majorit; /archives//html/Topband/1998-04/msg00070.html (8,323 bytes)
5. TopBand: CW segment (score: 1): Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1998 15:27:41 +0100; One of the difficulties is that the 160 allocation in a lot of Europe is limited. In the UK for example, we have 400 watts allowed from 1810 to 1850 and 26 watts from 1850 to 2000. If the US has a ma; /archives//html/Topband/1998-04/msg00071.html (7,898 bytes)
6. TopBand: CW segment (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Tue, 07 Apr 1998 18:30:03 EDT; Has everyone missed the March QST editorial? In it was a request by the ARRL to the FCC to define "gentlemen agreements" , "band plans" along with other grey area issues. If the FCC upholds the band; /archives//html/Topband/1998-04/msg00084.html (8,377 bytes)
7. TopBand: CW segment (score: 1): Author: frenaye@pcnet.com (Tom Frenaye); Date: Tue, 7 Apr 98 21:13:23 EST; True, but it wouldn't be impossible to make a change. False, there just hasn't been enough support for it. While the sentiment in New England was generally positive (but not 100%), there were other a; /archives//html/Topband/1998-04/msg00088.html (8,353 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]