Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+CQ160\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+CQ160\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: CQ160 (score: 1): Author: Lars Harlin" <lars.harlin@pocab.se (Lars Harlin); Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 12:53:42 +0100; Hi! Would like to announce that SL3ZV will be QRV in CQ160 multiop. Ops: SM3BDZ, SM3CVM, SM3GSK Rig: Kenwood TS870S PA: Homebrew KW Ant: Fullsize 4-square Let´s hope we´ll have a really g; /archives//html/Topband/1999-01/msg00199.html (6,774 bytes)
2. TopBand: CQ160 (score: 1): Author: lars.harlin@pocab.se (Lars Harlin); Date: Fri, 23 Jan 1998 08:47:41 +0100; Hi all! This weekend we`ll do a M/S effort in CQ160 from SL3ZV. Operators: SM3BDZ and SM3CVM and maybe a few others... Condx has improved a lot over the last 24 hours, heard several US stns this morn; /archives//html/Topband/1998-01/msg00252.html (6,673 bytes)
3. Topband: CQ160 (score: 1): Author: Carl Jonsson <carl.jonsson7@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2016 19:03:57 +0100; Cq160 is not very interesting for a dx-er anymore. A handfull of european big guns are covering the band with CQ over and over again but they don't seem to hear very well. During the morning hours I; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00703.html (6,936 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: CQ160 (score: 1): Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbert.schoenbohm@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 14:20:29 -0400; You nail it Carl....If there could only be by gentleman's agreement in Europe a 5 Khz window anywhere on the band for NA stations to be at least heard and worked...sort of a EU "CQ Test" machine free; /archives//html/Topband/2016-02/msg00027.html (9,545 bytes)
5. Re: Topband: CQ160 (score: 1): Author: Petr Ourednik <indians@xsmail.com>; Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 19:43:21 +0100; Herb for lot of EUs is prohibited to operate below 1810! For that reason we missed several stations which did not tuned up over the test... 73 - Petr, OK1RP BTW: definitely agree with Carl. I heard s; /archives//html/Topband/2016-02/msg00028.html (9,973 bytes)
6. Re: Topband: CQ160 (score: 1): Author: Henk PA5KT <pa5kt@remijn.net>; Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 20:24:44 +0100; During contest when the band is full with CQ machines I used to listen below 1810 to check out conditions. There are always stations active and as that part is always clear it is very useful to check; /archives//html/Topband/2016-02/msg00030.html (10,470 bytes)
7. Re: Topband: CQ160 (score: 1): Author: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 15:15:11 -0500; I found it very effective to "spread up". When conditions to EU were really top-notch Saturday night (your Sunday morning) I worked a lot of EU's above 1860 without the high QRM conditions found lowe; /archives//html/Topband/2016-02/msg00031.html (7,867 bytes)
8. Topband: CQ160 (score: 1): Author: Kevin Forster <kl7ky@arcticmail.com>; Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 00:39:57 +0100; _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector; /archives//html/Topband/2023-01/msg00132.html (6,122 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]