Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+A\s+NON\-elevated\s+radial\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+A\s+NON\-elevated\s+radial\s+question\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: A NON-elevated radial question (score: 1): Author: tbarnett@lexmark.com (Tyler Barnett); Date: 15 Oct 96 21:54:38 EDT; I hope that W8JIT and N7CL can comment on this one for me. I'd ask this offline, but maybe everyone can benefit from the question. My 80M 4-square is nearing completion (sorry this is an 80M question; /archives//html/Topband/1996-10/msg00213.html (8,137 bytes)
2. TopBand: A NON-elevated radial question (score: 1): Author: n7cl@sparx.mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson); Date: Wed, 16 Oct 1996 07:15:45 -0700; To: <topband@contesting.com> By my calculations, at 40 radials 50 feet long on 80 meters, you are at almost exactly 0.03 wavelengths tip to tip distance. Going to 80 radials might get you a bit over; /archives//html/Topband/1996-10/msg00216.html (10,516 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]