Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+5\/8\s+\~\s+vs\.\s+1\/2\s+\~\s+spacing\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: 5/8 ~ vs. 1/2 ~ spacing (score: 1)
Author: km3g@cts.com (Lane C. Zeitler)
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 1997 09:06:59 -0700
Gentlemen, Looks like the 5/8 wave spacing provides almost an entire dB greater main lobe gain over the half wave spacing for two verticals fed with zero degree phase shift. Side lobes start coming i
/archives//html/Topband/1997-10/msg00113.html (7,387 bytes)

2. TopBand: 5/8 ~ vs. 1/2 ~ spacing (score: 1)
Author: k6se@juno.com (Earl W Cunningham)
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 1997 14:16:25 EDT
On Thu, 9 Oct 1997 09:06:59 -0700 "Lane C. Zeitler" <km3g@cts.com> writes: main degree spacing element arrays. == I ran this through EZNEC v2.0 for zero-degree phasing, 1/4, 1/2 & 5/8-wave spacing (a
/archives//html/Topband/1997-10/msg00116.html (9,045 bytes)

3. TopBand: 5/8 ~ vs. 1/2 ~ spacing (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com)
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 1997 14:24:12 EDT
On Thu, 9 Oct 1997 09:06:59 -0700 "Lane C. Zeitler" <km3g@cts.com> writes: I cant comment on 5/8 wave spacing but back in the 80's at another QTH I had a pair of 1/4 wave cage verticals spaced 1/4 wa
/archives//html/Topband/1997-10/msg00120.html (7,698 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu