- 1. TopBand: 3DA0CA qrv 160? (score: 1)
- Author: jkjones@fn.net (Jon K. Jones)
- Date: Wed, 5 Nov 1997 09:48:34 -0600
- Last two evenings loud signals from 3DA0CA on 80m around 0315 utc into KS. Is 3DA0CA able to operate on 160m? I do not DX often on 3.5 MHz so don't have a feel for how signals there correlate to thos
- /archives//html/Topband/1997-11/msg00056.html (7,010 bytes)
- 2. TopBand: 3DA0CA qrv 160? (score: 1)
- Author: k6se@juno.com (Earl W Cunningham)
- Date: Wed, 05 Nov 1997 13:04:41 EST
- == I asked 3DA0CA on 80m if he could operate on 160m. He just ignored the question and went on running stations on 80m. 73, de Earl, K6SE -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/topband.html Submiss
- /archives//html/Topband/1997-11/msg00060.html (7,320 bytes)
- 3. TopBand: 3DA0CA qrv 160? (score: 1)
- Author: W0AH@aol.com (W0AH@aol.com)
- Date: Wed, 5 Nov 1997 17:28:29 -0500 (EST)
- << Not much heard on 160 while 80 was hopping. - Jon N0JK KS >> Jon, That was exactly my experience last night. Whereas IT7ZGY and DF2PY were peaking 559, I exchanged 5-( signals on 75M SSB with SP3G
- /archives//html/Topband/1997-11/msg00066.html (7,014 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu