Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+160M\s+Contests\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+160M\s+Contests\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: 160M Contests (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Mon, 03 Mar 1997 15:53:26 EST; I have to thank Dave, N4SU, for bringing the issue in to the open. The 160M reflector is the proper place to discuss the issue. I too have been "shot down" in private E-Mail to Herr Administrator....; /archives//html/Topband/1997-03/msg00011.html (10,280 bytes)
2. TopBand: 160M Contests (score: 1): Author: btippett@CTC.Net (Bill Tippett); Date: Mon, 03 Mar 1997 18:20:26 -0500 (EST); Hello Carl, Any censorship has been to try to keep the reflector focused on REAL information, and not become a bitch and gripe forum for every conceivable issue that happens to bother someone. I thin; /archives//html/Topband/1997-03/msg00013.html (9,732 bytes)
3. TopBand: 160M Contests (score: 1): Author: dfi@cyberhighway.net (Scott Cowling); Date: Tue, 4 Mar 1997 03:33:26 -0500 (EST); OK, OK. I can't stand it any more! Me, myself and I, all three being supreme net-lurkers, can keep still no more. In the spirit of friendly discussion, I wish to agree with some points and disagree w; /archives//html/Topband/1997-03/msg00018.html (11,265 bytes)
4. TopBand: 160M Contests (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Tue, 04 Mar 1997 20:50:38 EST; Hey Scotty.....I never said u had to agree with me. And I sure dont get angry when someone does. I hope that u read my other comments about Herr Administrator. I picked that up on the BoatAnchor refl; /archives//html/Topband/1997-03/msg00031.html (9,637 bytes)
5. TopBand: 160M Contests (score: 1): Author: jbmitch@vt.edu (John Mitchell); Date: Sat, 08 Mar 1997 10:20:26 -0500; Out of respect for Bill's decision about this thread, I have not posted about this since he suggested we limit this, but having read all the other commentary, pro or con, I am compelled to make one f; /archives//html/Topband/1997-03/msg00059.html (9,607 bytes)
6. TopBand: 160M Contests (score: 1): Author: w8jitom@worldnet.att.net (Tom Rauch (W8JI)); Date: Sat, 08 Mar 1997 13:52:25 -0500; Hi John, This will turn into another east coast/ rest of the country fight again. In the 70's, after the LORAN moved, I petetioned the FCC to segment 160. At that time I was well acquainted with seve; /archives//html/Topband/1997-03/msg00060.html (9,281 bytes)
7. TopBand: 160M Contests (score: 1): Author: btippett@CTC.Net (Bill Tippett); Date: Sat, 08 Mar 1997 20:06:29 -0500 (EST); Hi John! Now you're getting to the REAL issue behind the problems with windows, contests, SSB vs CW, etc! I have written a letter to K1ZZ, ARRL Executive VP and encourage all ARRL members to write th; /archives//html/Topband/1997-03/msg00063.html (8,342 bytes)
8. TopBand: 160M Contests (score: 1): Author: nw6n@inreach.com (bob wendling); Date: Sun, 09 Mar 97 12:05:43 gmt; I agree with John, Cw segment 1840 and below with the typical allocation for license classes as well both cw and ssb.... 1800-1825 extra/cw only 1825-1840 general/advanced/extra cw only 1840-1850 ext; /archives//html/Topband/1997-03/msg00069.html (8,071 bytes)
9. TopBand: 160M Contests (score: 1): Author: btippett@CTC.Net (Bill Tippett); Date: Sun, 09 Mar 1997 17:07:06 -0500 (EST); The following response came from an ARRL Vice Director: "Thanks for the suggestion, Bill. This is the way things happen at ARRL - from the grass roots. Our next meeting is in July. A phone call to yo; /archives//html/Topband/1997-03/msg00070.html (8,125 bytes)
10. TopBand: 160M Contests (score: 1): Author: geoiii@bga.com (george fremin iii); Date: Sun, 9 Mar 1997 17:00:41 -0600 (CST); I think this would create problems - since the band is already all open to general and above. Why bother with the extra and extra/advanced subbands? 1800-1840 cw only general and above 1840-2000 ssb/; /archives//html/Topband/1997-03/msg00071.html (8,517 bytes)
11. TopBand: 160M Contests (score: 1): Author: Jon.zaimes@dol.net (Jon zaimes); Date: Mon, 10 Mar 1997 02:30:01 -0500 (EST); Hi Bob...interesting proposal! I think the license class subbands would be a good idea. But why should the CW allocation on 160 be proportionately less than it is on higher bands? On 80 and 40 meters; /archives//html/Topband/1997-03/msg00079.html (9,052 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]