Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+160\/80\s+shunt\s+fed\s+tower\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+160\/80\s+shunt\s+fed\s+tower\?\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: 160/80 shunt fed tower? (score: 1): Author: wv5s@icon.net (wv5s@icon.net); Date: Tue, 26 Nov 1996 09:03:49 +0000; Hello Topbanders, I have a 65 ft tower with a TH7 and 40-2CD on top and 16 radials from 1/8 to 1/4 wavelength long. I have shunt fed it for 160m with a jumper across the 18 inch spaced shunt at abt 5; /archives//html/Topband/1996-11/msg00383.html (8,783 bytes)
2. TopBand: 160/80 shunt fed tower? (score: 1): Author: rgarrett@sunlink.net (Bob Garrett); Date: Tue, 26 Nov 1996 16:36:40 -0500 (EST); Hello: Just a few thoughts. First and formost, MORE RADIALS! Never to many radials. No, I have never experienced a degradation of my 160 meter signal when I added another shunt for 80 meters. My towe; /archives//html/Topband/1996-11/msg00385.html (8,323 bytes)
3. TopBand: 160/80 shunt fed tower? (score: 1): Author: gtaft@voyager.net (gtaft@voyager.net); Date: Tue, 26 Nov 1996 23:50:59 -0500 (EST); Jim I have used my 78ft tower for years as a 160M shunt fed vertical. It has plenty of top loading - 5 el 20M KLM yagi and a Mosley 2 el 40. Works great on top band. I decided to try it for 80 and pu; /archives//html/Topband/1996-11/msg00394.html (10,484 bytes)
4. TopBand: 160/80 shunt fed tower? (score: 1): Author: jon.zaimes@dol.net (Jon Zaimes AA1K); Date: Wed, 27 Nov 1996 02:44:04 -0500 (EST); Hi Jim...My first shunt-fed tower was similar to yours (in Connecticut, 1978). It was 70 feet of Rohn 25 with a 204BA on top and a 4-el 15m Wilson yagi a few feet above that. As I recall the 160m shu; /archives//html/Topband/1996-11/msg00397.html (10,626 bytes)
5. TopBand: 160/80 shunt fed tower? (score: 1): Author: George.Guerin@kellogg.com (George Guerin); Date: Wed, 27 Nov 1996 09:06:30 -0500; --IMA.Boundary.997301948 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; name="RFC822 message headers" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: cc:Mail note part Content-Disposition: attachme; /archives//html/Topband/1996-11/msg00404.html (13,248 bytes)
6. TopBand: 160/80 shunt fed tower? (score: 1): Author: grimm@alison.sbc.edu (Kenneth D. Grimm); Date: Wed, 27 Nov 1996 10:54:55 -0800; Jim inquired: <big snip> and George replied: It makes perfect sense to me. Been there, done that. I wonder if this would be a good opportunity to play with some kind of decoupling stub arrangement. A; /archives//html/Topband/1996-11/msg00406.html (9,233 bytes)
7. TopBand: 160/80 shunt fed tower? (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Wed, 27 Nov 1996 11:45:28 EST; I found the same problem with a 100' tower and a 10/15/20 Xmas tree 10 years ago. Could never get the 80 to really play. I then grid dipped the tower and found it was 1/4 wave reasonant on 1450KHz! I; /archives//html/Topband/1996-11/msg00409.html (11,915 bytes)
8. TopBand: 160/80 shunt fed tower? (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Wed, 27 Nov 1996 18:21:26 EST; Tnx for the info Charles....I'll dig out that '94 article. I have found here that even elevated radials require more than 4 for me on 160. I have a pair of full size 1/4 wave for 160M hanging from th; /archives//html/Topband/1996-11/msg00411.html (9,442 bytes)
9. TopBand: 160/80 shunt fed tower? (score: 1): Author: nx1g@top.monad.net (Craig Clark); Date: Wed, 27 Nov 1996 20:59:44 -0600; A good article to read in addition to the True piece is from QST Oct 75 W5RTQ has an article on feeding a crank-up on 80 and 160. I suggest u look at it. This article is also in Antenna Anthology (oo; /archives//html/Topband/1996-11/msg00413.html (8,667 bytes)
10. TopBand: 160/80 shunt fed tower? (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Wed, 27 Nov 1996 23:53:34 EST; Hello Olaf. I will not pretend to be a Slinky Beverage expert.....just the originator! My first one was in 1985. I use 5 in series and stretched over 175'. I use a standard 500 +\- Ohm termination an; /archives//html/Topband/1996-11/msg00418.html (9,167 bytes)
11. TopBand: 160/80 shunt fed tower? (score: 1): Author: CQK8DO@aol.com (CQK8DO@aol.com); Date: Fri, 29 Nov 1996 08:45:47 -0500; << I found the same problem with a 100' tower and a 10/15/20 Xmas tree 10 years ago. Could never get the 80 to really play. I then grid dipped the tower and found it was 1/4 wave reasonant on 1450KHz; /archives//html/Topband/1996-11/msg00439.html (8,462 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]