Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+\.\s*$/: 86 ]

Total 86 documents matching your query.

21. Topband: DX (score: 1): Author: r.c.eldridge@ieee.org (Bob Eldridge ); Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 10:40:45 -0700; Inspired by Mike's comment (and feeling a bit guilty about sleeping in this summer) I checked the band this morning 26 July. At 0955 there was a beautiful SSB signal from Raf CX2CB on 1845 kHz, and; /archives//html/Topband/2000-07/msg00045.html (7,019 bytes)
22. Topband: dx (score: 1): Author: W7lr@aol.com (W7lr@aol.com); Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 16:07:57 EST; 04 to 05z 21 March heard OM0WR EA3VY PA0CLN DJ7AA DF2PY but none could hear me. At the 4am local time (1100z) slot (too early for that path with our sunrise 1320z) I've listened for V85AA but nothing; /archives//html/Topband/2000-03/msg00067.html (7,003 bytes)
23. Topband: dx (score: 1): Author: earlham@radiks.net (Iowaguy); Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 16:04:21 -0600; Well, it's nice to see that someone is still hearing topband DX. The springtime QRN has gotten so bad here in Iowa the past few weeks that it's become rather hopeless. The Beverages are of no real he; /archives//html/Topband/2000-03/msg00068.html (6,681 bytes)
24. Topband: JA (score: 1): Author: bogus@does.not.exist.com (); Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2000 10:32:42 EST; Not sure how much leverage we have on this since JA bands are a JA decision, but they may consider our inputs. I'm not against change, but the present system seems to be working well. I don't see any; /archives//html/Topband/2000-02/msg00131.html (7,472 bytes)
25. Topband: JA (score: 1): Author: ja0dai@ba.mbn.or.jp (S. Watanabe); Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2000 13:27:33 +0900; Hello Topbanders, Thank you very much fellows for your interests on JA band subject. As reported, reserved band segment of 1810 - 1825kHz will be released to Japanese Amateurs after 1 Apr. 2000. The; /archives//html/Topband/2000-02/msg00137.html (7,781 bytes)
26. Topband: JA (score: 1): Author: ni6t@best.com (Garry & Yelena); Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2000 20:35:58 +0000; I think the issue is what is best for the JA's from THEIR standpoint. Frankly, I don't see how being at 1.9 MHz is a big Wow for JA topbanders, who presently cannot just come down and join the pileup; /archives//html/Topband/2000-02/msg00138.html (7,095 bytes)
27. Topband: DX (score: 1): Author: kn4lf@webtv.net (Thomas Giella); Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 10:13:00 -0500 (EST); I worked HB2CXZ on 1840.5 LSB at 0544 UTC this morning with my QRP 100 watts, he was 59 here in Central Florida. I can't find any info on this station in QRZ or Buckmasters. Did I copy the C/S wrong?; /archives//html/Topband/2000-02/msg00208.html (6,711 bytes)
28. Topband: Jw (score: 1): Author: la6wea@online.no (La6wea); Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 23:00:03 +0100; La7fd and myself will be qrv from Svalbard from the 21 of Feb until 27 = of Feb. Callsigns are Jw7fd and Jw6wea. I will as allways be found on 80 = and 160 m so hope to here you guys from Jw. I will; /archives//html/Topband/2000-01/msg00265.html (6,661 bytes)
29. Topband: dx (score: 1): Author: W7lr@aol.com (W7lr@aol.com); Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 22:00:13 EST; Haven't seen any spots for 9V1PC but he was on 1827.9 khz 18 nov around 1400z. No copy here in Montana, but was worked by N6FF N7UA and a few w6's. Hope to hear him and V85 before long. 73 Bob W7LR -; /archives//html/Topband/1999-11/msg00115.html (6,372 bytes)
30. Topband: DX (score: 1): Author: th.roth@apc.de (Thomas Roth); Date: Sat, 10 Jul 1999 22:38:28 +0200; Hi friends, while working some on 80 last night I switched on my R-390A just to check out 160. Was I ever surprised folks !!! Around 2230z on 1830.4kc there was quite a huge pile-up. People were call; /archives//html/Topband/1999-07/msg00020.html (7,022 bytes)
31. Topband: PY (score: 1): Author: bazley@fullcomp.com.au (Michael Bazley); Date: Sun, 2 May 1999 08:54:32 +0800; Hi All, I apologise for the bandwidth but I have noticed that PY7AB and PT7BR have both been reported on the 160 reflector. If anyone has an e-mail address or contact with these stations information; /archives//html/Topband/1999-05/msg00003.html (6,753 bytes)
32. Topband: V6 (score: 1): Author: bob.read@ieee.org (Bob Marshall-Read); Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 05:56:33 +0100; Topbanders, It seems that with a few exceptions, V6 is needed and looks promising. The group will probably be mostly G's, and plans being formulated now would put the trip mid-February to the first f; /archives//html/Topband/1999-05/msg00019.html (6,879 bytes)
33. Topband: R: (score: 1): Author: Maurizio Panicara" <i4jmy@iol.it (Maurizio Panicara); Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1999 12:52:31 +0200; About line: First of all, a low loss TV coax cable is not necessarily better (or is only marginally better) than an RG58. This happens because at low frequencies the losses are mainly due to conducto; /archives//html/Topband/1999-04/msg00092.html (8,236 bytes)
34. TopBand: TZ (score: 1): Author: oz8abe@post6.tele.dk (Bo Soegaard); Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 17:44:47 +0100; Hi there Larry TZ6VV is QRV again and will try to be active until April 3 and he will be checking condx on topband after 22z. 73's de Bo oz8abe -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/topband.html S; /archives//html/Topband/1999-03/msg00160.html (6,452 bytes)
35. TopBand: dx (score: 1): Author: W7lr@aol.com (W7lr@aol.com); Date: Wed, 31 Mar 1999 17:27:22 EST; T33RD says they will be there two more days. CN8WW was s6 here last evening, but snow blizzard static was s8. Worked them at 0549 utc. Like N6TR said, they cq after 0600z but didnt work many after th; /archives//html/Topband/1999-03/msg00184.html (6,542 bytes)
36. TopBand: dx (score: 1): Author: W7lr@aol.com (W7lr@aol.com); Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 09:32:15 EST; Any info on LZ0A, S. Shetlands, on 160? Last evening I heard OZ7YY on 1822 khz 0410 utc. 73 Bob W7LR -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/topband.html Submissions: topband@contesting.com Administ; /archives//html/Topband/1999-01/msg00111.html (6,244 bytes)
37. TopBand: YJ (score: 1): Author: W7lr@aol.com (W7lr); Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1998 13:48:39 EDT; K0JUH - tried to send you an email about your OH2BUA spot for YJ0ADJ on 1828.3 at 1124z, but it bounced. Can you tell us how workable he was, and if you know if that is DJ2EH who was FW2EH and who wa; /archives//html/Topband/1998-04/msg00144.html (6,709 bytes)
38. TopBand: YJ (score: 1): Author: n6tr@teleport.com (Tree N6TR); Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1998 11:01:44 -0700 (PDT); N0JK reported: I was there at 13Z, along with a handful of others. I never heard the YJ, but I guess others could hear him (one W6 said he was 579). The YJ reported that the QRN was very bad and didn; /archives//html/Topband/1998-04/msg00151.html (6,742 bytes)
39. TopBand: yj (score: 1): Author: W7lr@aol.com (W7lr); Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1998 14:10:43 EDT; The 11 and 13z activity didnt materialize. NE9Z reported him on 12 ssb (from the OH2 cluster) around 11z. A station signing YJ0ADJ came on 1828 at 1235z calling cq cq but acted as if he could not cop; /archives//html/Topband/1998-04/msg00152.html (6,699 bytes)
40. TopBand: yj (score: 1): Author: ne9z@sprynet.com (ne9z@sprynet.com); Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1998 14:04:20 -0700 (PDT); Bob, W7LR, wrote the following to topband reflector: To: <topband@contesting.com> Bob's being humble. Bob should have said YJ0ADJ could not copy any of the stations except his own big signal. Before; /archives//html/Topband/1998-04/msg00154.html (7,756 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]