Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+\"Best\"\s+Receiver\s+for\s+160\s+Work\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+\"Best\"\s+Receiver\s+for\s+160\s+Work\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: "Best" Receiver for 160 Work (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (Earl W Cunningham); Date: Fri, 01 Jan 1999 02:45:53 EST; On Thu, 31 Dec 1998 14:43:54 -0600 Nelson Moyer <ku0a@blue.weeg.uiowa.edu> writes: "After using an FT707 (no 160) since 1981, I'm finally able to get a new radio. The short list, based upon max. avai; /archives//html/Topband/1999-01/msg00007.html (9,073 bytes)
2. TopBand: "Best" Receiver for 160 Work (score: 1): Author: Richard@foxfield.demon.co.uk (Richard McLachlan); Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1999 09:42:30 +0000; I have access to just about every item of ham gear commercially available. By far the best RX I have ever tried on 160 is the JRC NRD 545. However, this is an RX only, not a transceiver. -- Richard M; /archives//html/Topband/1999-01/msg00009.html (8,869 bytes)
3. TopBand: "Best" Receiver for 160 Work (score: 1): Author: Clive Penna" <clive@gm3poi.prestel.co.uk (Clive Penna); Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1999 11:16:04 -0000; Hi Nelson, If you don't want to loose a lot of friends forget the Omni Clix I've not heard one yet that does not have them on the LF side. And with 160m signal levels at times you could be unpopular.; /archives//html/Topband/1999-01/msg00010.html (9,670 bytes)
4. TopBand: "Best" Receiver for 160 Work (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (Earl W Cunningham); Date: Fri, 01 Jan 1999 13:37:52 EST; == I guess my comment above was misinterpreted by some. More explicitly, the comments I heard from a number of OMNI VI+ owners made it sound like they often had to send their rigs into Ten-Tec for re; /archives//html/Topband/1999-01/msg00011.html (8,674 bytes)
5. TopBand: "Best" Receiver for 160 Work (score: 1): Author: wd4jra@planttel.net (John Vickers); Date: Fri, 01 Jan 1999 14:54:42 -0500; Hi Earl es All Have a 1993 model Omni 6 here. only time its been back to the factory was to be upgraded to the 6+. I also use Collins R390A, 75A4, and Drake R4C (sherwood mods) on 160. My test equipm; /archives//html/Topband/1999-01/msg00014.html (8,914 bytes)
6. TopBand: "Best" Receiver for 160 Work (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom); Date: Sat, 02 Jan 1999 00:19:22 -0500; Hi Clive, Most rigs that work QSK click, especially on split frequency operation. Even if waveshape is good, the VCO's don't settle down totally before RF comes out. 73 Tom -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.; /archives//html/Topband/1999-01/msg00019.html (7,935 bytes)
7. TopBand: "Best" Receiver for 160 Work (score: 1): Author: CQK8DO@aol.com (CQK8DO@aol.com); Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1999 08:46:59 EST; I went through this whole exercise a couple of years ago in starting to build a new contest station (still ongoing).. In my case there were no budget limitations, so all radios from the cheapies, to; /archives//html/Topband/1999-01/msg00032.html (8,594 bytes)
8. TopBand: "Best" Receiver for 160 Work (score: 1): Author: ku0a@blue.weeg.uiowa.edu (Nelson Moyer); Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1998 14:43:54 -0600; After using an FT707 (no 160) since 1981, I'm finally able to get a new radio. The short list, based upon max. available funds for rig, PS and filters (approx. $3000 plus or minus 300) is down to the; /archives//html/Topband/1998-12/msg00351.html (7,193 bytes)
9. SV: TopBand: "Best" Receiver for 160 Work (score: 1): Author: harlins@swipnet.se (LARS HARLIN); Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1998 23:33:39 +0100; -- relative out Hi Nelson, and happy new year to all you guys! I´ve been using the Knwd TS870 for two years, mainly at topband, now. Must say that overall I´m quite happy with the radio,; /archives//html/Topband/1998-12/msg00352.html (8,322 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]