Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+question\s+about\s+50\.125\s+use\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] question about 50.125 use (score: 1)
Author: "Gregg Seidl" <k9kl@centurytel.net>
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 18:51:08 -0500
Last night( 6-02) 6 meters was wide wide open here in EN64.The band was fairly full of signals from 125 thru 200 or so.I found an opening at 127.5 or so.I heard or saw on the scope that there was som
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-06/msg00008.html (8,515 bytes)

2. Re: [VHFcontesting] question about 50.125 use (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <n5ten@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 16:54:13 -0700 (PDT)
The purpose of the calling frequency is to call and make QSOs. It is not the listening frequency. 73s John W5TD http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting ____________________________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-06/msg00009.html (9,381 bytes)

3. Re: [VHFcontesting] question about 50.125 use (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 17:14:35 -0700 (PDT)
Here is a quote from some fella by the name of Riley Hollingsworth, as attributed to a Dayton speech he made: <snip> But what concerns me most is this: You still need to "lighten up." I said that las
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-06/msg00010.html (8,507 bytes)

4. Re: [VHFcontesting] question about 50.125 use (score: 1)
Author: "WBR" <wbr@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 20:50:22 -0400
I think that you did the right thing. One thing I don't understand, (or maybe I am perceiving thing a little incorrectly, i.e. maybe it is not the case) it seems to me that everyone tries to get on t
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-06/msg00012.html (9,923 bytes)

5. Re: [VHFcontesting] question about 50.125 use (score: 1)
Author: Fred Lass <felasstic@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 02:41:23 -0700 (PDT)
I would absolutely call it harrassment. Gregg Seidl <k9kl@centurytel.net> wrote:I found an opening at 127.5 or so. I had a gentleman give me a hard time for being "too close" to the call freq.A real
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-06/msg00014.html (7,522 bytes)

6. Re: [VHFcontesting] question about 50.125 use (score: 1)
Author: "John Wilcox / NS1Z" <ns1z@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 10:04:55 -0000
If his equipment had been adequate he would have been too busy working stations to waste your time and his with this petty complaint. Remember when the calling frequency was 50.110? It almost seems l
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-06/msg00015.html (10,290 bytes)

7. Re: [VHFcontesting] question about 50.125 use (score: 1)
Author: w0ld <w0ld@pcisys.net>
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 04:24:43 -0600
One wonders what the gentleman, who gave you a hard time, was missing by having you exercise the privileges of your license? Those who are abusive about the calling frequency are sitting there waitin
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-06/msg00017.html (10,157 bytes)

8. Re: [VHFcontesting] question about 50.125 use (score: 1)
Author: "JIM" <N2NRD@COMCAST.NET>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 08:16:14 -0400
Gregg don't worry about the hassle. You may have improved your qso run rate by sliding up the band. Sounds like someone was running with wide filters or the noise blanker on and agc slow. See you on
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-06/msg00018.html (8,171 bytes)

9. Re: [VHFcontesting] question about 50.125 use (score: 1)
Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 05:30:54 -0700
It is not clear to me from the original post whether the complainant was someone who was operating on 50.125 or some other "frequency cop" who was not actually making contacts on any frequency, but j
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-06/msg00019.html (12,318 bytes)

10. Re: [VHFcontesting] question about 50.125 use (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 08:06:44 -0500 (CDT)
If people tune around for stations, that will inspire others to call CQ on frequencies other than the calling frequency in a contest. I have nothing against using 50.125. But in the Spring 50 MHz Spr
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-06/msg00020.html (9,220 bytes)

11. Re: [VHFcontesting] question about 50.125 use (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <n5ten@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 06:43:34 -0700 (PDT)
It is amazing, the number of self appointed police and saviors that this hobby seems to bring out. We have the: 1. DX pileup cops-always QRM the DX station by sending/shouting UP UP non-stop. 2. The
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-06/msg00021.html (13,012 bytes)

12. Re: [VHFcontesting] question about 50.125 use (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <n5ten@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 06:45:55 -0700 (PDT)
Yes, but he got to hear wide, full bodied, broadcast quality hi-fi QRM. 73s John W5TD ____________________________________________________________________________________ Moody friends. Drama queens.
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-06/msg00022.html (8,451 bytes)

13. Re: [VHFcontesting] question about 50.125 use (score: 1)
Author: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 02:24:11 -0600
Sharing from a favorite list of rules to live by: "Don't take anything personally. Nothing others do is because of you. What others say and do is a projection of their own reality, their own dream. W
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-06/msg00044.html (10,449 bytes)

14. Re: [VHFcontesting] question about 50.125 use (score: 1)
Author: Steve Raas <sraas@optonline.net>
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 07:25:47 -0400
The calling freq typically I see is left for rovers/low power stations ( here on the east coast ) Unless there is a band opening.. then that all goes to heck. N2JDQ Steven J. Raas Locator FN20vg QRV
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-06/msg00046.html (11,582 bytes)

15. Re: [VHFcontesting] question about 50.125 use (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 17:58:39 -0500
this should be subject: too close to to qsos in progress.... I would try to get farther than 2.5 kc way from someone.. The average Joes radio have pretty poor 2.4 - 2.8khz ssb filters.. The grouch/ca
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-06/msg00053.html (11,618 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu