Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+comments\s+from\s+non\-submitters\?\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] comments from non-submitters? (score: 1)
Author: rick1ds@hotmail.com (Rick R)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:41 2003
Ev asks for more input from those who do not submit contest logs, however I doubt that many non-submitters would be subscribed to this reflector. Rick, K1DS/R ________________________________________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01598.html (7,953 bytes)

2. [VHFcontesting] comments from non-submitters? (score: 1)
Author: tomc7@earthlink.net (Tom Carney)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:41 2003
I believe Ev was proposing we search the logs of the top 10 stations for people who did not submit logs. We would then contact those stations to determine why they did not submit logs. (Did I get tha
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01600.html (8,503 bytes)

3. [VHFcontesting] comments from non-submitters? (score: 1)
Author: w2ev@arrl.net (Ev Tupis (W2EV))
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:41 2003
Yes, Tom. You've got it. This can't be difficult to do (identifying who participated but didn't submit). The tough part is reaching them to ask them why. If done with tact, there's no reason in the w
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01606.html (8,517 bytes)

4. [VHFcontesting] comments from non-submitters? (score: 1)
Author: frenaye@direcway.com (Tom Frenaye)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:41 2003
Sounds like it might be useful information to have. Rather than making it into a research project that no one has the time to do, a simpler (do-it-now) solution might for each person on the reflector
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01608.html (11,538 bytes)

5. [VHFcontesting] comments from non-submitters? (score: 1)
Author: w2ev@arrl.net (Ev Tupis (W2EV))
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:41 2003
Tom Frenaye wrote: -- Sounds like it might be useful information to have. Rather than making it into a research project that no one has the time to do, a simpler (do-it-now) solution might for each p
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01612.html (8,857 bytes)

6. [VHFcontesting] comments from non-submitters? (score: 1)
Author: k0emt@dbBear.com (Bryan - k0emt)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:41 2003
As someone who doesn't turn in all my logs, I feel qualified to comment on this topic. Several reasons why I don't turn in logs: - Didn't have time to operate whole contest, not much to show. - Band
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01615.html (9,241 bytes)

7. [VHFcontesting] comments from non-submitters? (score: 1)
Author: w2ev@arrl.net (Ev Tupis (W2EV))
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:41 2003
== People participate because: o It's fun o There's a reward for doing so People submit logs because: o It's easy o There's a reward for doing so == Bryan (K0EMT) wrote the following insights that fi
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01618.html (10,564 bytes)

8. [VHFcontesting] comments from non-submitters? (score: 1)
Author: frenaye@direcway.com (Tom Frenaye)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:41 2003
The ARRL does accept paper logs, but sure prefers and appreciates them electronically. As someone else said, the recent NCJ Sprint contest had a web-based input form that seemed to work well. I'm hop
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01619.html (9,813 bytes)

9. [VHFcontesting] comments from non-submitters? (score: 1)
Author: tomc7@earthlink.net (Tom Carney)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:41 2003
I received a reply from one of the stations that I worked during the Jan contest who did not submit a log. He listed the problems he had with the robot (during a previous submittal) and the removal o
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01634.html (9,181 bytes)

10. [VHFcontesting] comments from non-submitters? (score: 1)
Author: johngeig@yahoo.com (John Geiger)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:41 2003
I have seen several different threads about people having trouble with the robot, and I have had plenty myself. I use an older version of a logging program which always puts the out-of-date contest c
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01636.html (10,264 bytes)

11. [VHFcontesting] comments from non-submitters? (score: 1)
Author: w2ev@arrl.net (Ev Tupis (W2EV))
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:41 2003
People submit logs because: o It's easy to do o There's a reward for doing so It sounds like the first is more important than the second to this person. After all, they tried to submit, but were thwa
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01637.html (9,948 bytes)

12. [VHFcontesting] comments from non-submitters? (score: 1)
Author: clem.law@usa.net (Richard Clem)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:42 2003
I don't quite qualify to respond to this thread, since I did submit a log in the January VHF Sweepstakes. My XYL and I did put in a fairly big effort, and although it looks like we'll be taking last
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01647.html (11,880 bytes)

13. [VHFcontesting] comments from non-submitters? (score: 1)
Author: aa1yn@aa1yn.com (Lee Scott - AA1YN)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:42 2003
Rick, I have the feeling you are well qualified to speak about submitting your logs. You are probably the type who would not submit logs and maybe by understanding what made you decide to submit is j
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01654.html (14,824 bytes)

14. [VHFcontesting] comments from non-submitters? (score: 1)
Author: tomc7@earthlink.net (Tom Carney)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:42 2003
*logging*, it Anyone have a solution for this problem? As a rover I tried using an old portable PC and a logging program. However the glare from the sum made it impossible to read the screen. So I en
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01661.html (9,131 bytes)

15. [VHFcontesting] comments from non-submitters? (score: 1)
Author: tree@kkn.net (Tree)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:42 2003
We have prototyped a web based log entry form that does basically this. Currently, it only works for the NCJ Sprint contests however. While it is easy to use, I think it is slower than using a loggi
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01662.html (9,307 bytes)

16. [VHFcontesting] comments from non-submitters? (score: 1)
Author: danlevans@msn.com (Dan Evans K9ZF)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:42 2003
VHFTest and KM Rover logger are a couple I have used. I am pretty sure they both have a mode for logging "after the fact". In this mode you enter the date and time manually for each QSO. I don't have
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01663.html (10,318 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu