Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Why\s+ARRL\s+and\s+CQWW\s+VHF\s+rules\s+discriminate\s+against\s+portable\s+and\s+hill\s+topper\s+stations\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Why\s+ARRL\s+and\s+CQWW\s+VHF\s+rules\s+discriminate\s+against\s+portable\s+and\s+hill\s+topper\s+stations\.\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Why ARRL and CQWW VHF rules discriminate against portable and hill topper stations. (score: 1): Author: peter hutter via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2023 20:25:46 +0000 (UTC); One criteria of the ARRL VHF contest rules for portableoperation seems restrictive is the 10W power limit. Battery and portable powerstation technologies have made significant advances in recent time; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2023-06/msg00053.html (8,750 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]