- 1. [VHFcontesting] Why "Unlimited" (score: 1)
- Author: k4gun@comcast.net
- Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:06:39 +0000 (UTC)
- Perhaps we need to be asking a different question here. Its obvious that a LOT of non-rovers and even a couple of rovers don't see why there is a problem. For those of you who don't get the problem
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-11/msg00089.html (7,931 bytes)
- 2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Why "Unlimited" (score: 1)
- Author: John Geiger <aa5jg@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:10:05 -0800 (PST)
- Ask Mainly because enough people got on the reflector complaining about people who grid circled, if memory serves me correctly. 73s John AA5JG _______________________________________________ VHFconte
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-11/msg00090.html (7,401 bytes)
- 3. Re: [VHFcontesting] Why "Unlimited" (score: 1)
- Author: "John D'Ausilio" <jdausilio@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:59:11 -0500
- Exactly, John .. it was designed to give the grid-circlers a category to compete within while the more traditional rovers could compete with similar stations. The fact that the grid circlers decided
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-11/msg00092.html (8,800 bytes)
- 4. Re: [VHFcontesting] Why "Unlimited" (score: 1)
- Author: kb7dqh@donobi.net
- Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 01:27:17 -0800 (PST)
- I believe, "largely ignored" because the "unlimited rover" category is so new that few in the VHF contesting community have actually built up a station that can support operation on many bands simult
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-11/msg00114.html (11,404 bytes)
- 5. Re: [VHFcontesting] Why "Unlimited" (score: 1)
- Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 03:04:18 -0800 (PST)
- This is the core of the issue. Rover scores are calculated differently than all other categories. Therefore they are incentivized differently and therefore they act differently. A first step would b
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-11/msg00115.html (8,822 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu