Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Where\s+Have\s+All\s+the\s+Multi\'s\s+Gone\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Where\s+Have\s+All\s+the\s+Multi\'s\s+Gone\?\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Where Have All the Multi's Gone? (score: 1): Author: Ed Kucharski <k3dne@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 08:36:33 -0500 (EST); I'm doing some research and digging for data about the recent thread associated with the effect FTx has had on traditional weak signal modes (ssb/cw). In the process I noticed a dramatic decrease in; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-01/msg00169.html (8,587 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Where Have All the Multi's Gone? (score: 1): Author: Ed Kucharski <k3dne@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 08:45:07 -0500 (EST); Sorry, the chart did not retain its formatting. I was afraid of that - should have sent it to myself first to test. I tried an Excel file too but got an error message it was too big. I'll try to figu; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-01/msg00170.html (11,819 bytes)
3. [VHFcontesting] Where Have All the Multi's Gone? (score: 1): Author: Ed Kucharski <k3dne@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 08:59:06 -0500 (EST); I couldn't embed the chart in the email so it is now attached. I'm doing some research and digging for data about the recent thread associated with the effect FTx has had on traditional weak signal m; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-01/msg00171.html (7,819 bytes)
4. Re: [VHFcontesting] Where Have All the Multi's Gone? (score: 1): Author: Ed Kucharski <k3dne@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 11:02:00 -0500 (EST); Jack: All the reasons you listed are viable. It is hard work to set-up a multi station, even harder if it is portable. I'm sure that has something to do with it. Our silent keys and aging may be fact; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-01/msg00174.html (11,930 bytes)
5. Re: [VHFcontesting] Where Have All the Multi's Gone? (score: 1): Author: Jeff Townsend <wb8lyj@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 12:26:41 -0500; One category that has gone up since the early 2000s are rovers. In 2019 there were 84 and 79 in 2020. Jeff Townsend WB8LYJ/R _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-01/msg00175.html (13,012 bytes)
6. Re: [VHFcontesting] Where Have All the Multi's Gone? (score: 1): Author: Dave <kdcarlso@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 13:35:22 -0500; Sadly, if we don't resolve the FT8 issue I'm not sure the rover count will stay up either. I just bought a few amplifiers from a guy who's only been roving for a few years. I asked why he was giving; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-01/msg00178.html (14,055 bytes)
7. Re: [VHFcontesting] Where Have All the Multi's Gone? (score: 1): Author: Don KB2YSI <kb2ysi@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 14:02:21 -0500; I completely agree Dave. Sitting in a rover, pressing the memory keyer over and over for a few hours with little to no results is bad enough. The pounce break from calling CQ usually ending with not; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-01/msg00180.html (16,501 bytes)
8. Re: [VHFcontesting] Where Have All the Multi's Gone? (score: 1): Author: Terry Price <terry@directivesystems.com>; Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 14:02:55 -0500; Ed, et all, There are several reasons for the decline, mostly age. K3YTL, W3SO and others have lost folks that pretty well crippled them. Others had families to raise, most folks don't know what a he; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-01/msg00181.html (16,740 bytes)
9. Re: [VHFcontesting] Where Have All the Multi's Gone? (score: 1): Author: Ed Kucharski <k3dne@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 21:08:49 -0500 (EST); Fantastic reply to my post, Terry! Thanks. Well said! I admire your passion and dedication. What you and the K8GP team as well as many other multi's (and rovers) do, did and achieve(d) are remarkable; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-01/msg00185.html (27,798 bytes)
10. Re: [VHFcontesting] Where Have All the Multi's Gone? (score: 1): Author: Dan Evans via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2021 02:12:53 +0000 (UTC); Have to agree with the FT8 issues. I actually love FT8. It's great to work amazing range with a small station. But it kills me to work S5 stations on FT8, after calling CQ on SSB with no takers...; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-01/msg00186.html (9,795 bytes)
11. Re: [VHFcontesting] Where Have All the Multi's Gone? (score: 1): Author: Marshall Pochay <wd9exd@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 21:59:18 -0600 (CST); Hi Terry and everyone, Could someone tell me how these casual operators are abusing FT8 enough that we are not supposed to work them? I see a casual operator one that probably wont turn a log in but; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-01/msg00188.html (12,869 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]