Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+W3ZZ\s+\&\s+Activity\s+Level\s+in\s+June\s+ARRL\s+VHF\s+QSO\s+Party\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] W3ZZ & Activity Level in June ARRL VHF QSO Party (score: 1)
Author: N3AWS@aol.com (N3AWS@aol.com)
Date: Sun Jun 29 05:29:54 2003
A couple of months ago W3ZZ initiated a thread on this and other VHF reflectors exploring what could be done to increase activity in VHF contests. A lively discussion ensued with lots of folks contri
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02160.html (7,856 bytes)

2. [VHFcontesting] W3ZZ & Activity Level in June ARRL VHF QSO Party (score: 1)
Author: timcoad@excite.com (Tim Coad)
Date: Sun Jun 29 12:39:31 2003
I saw almost zero FM activity (except on 223.5) this year in CM87. It gets less each year. In the 80's and early 90's I could easily make 200 FM contacts from home (300 to 400 from a hill top) on 2 m
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02161.html (9,399 bytes)

3. [VHFcontesting] W3ZZ & Activity Level in June ARRL VHF QSO Party (score: 1)
Author: W2fca@cs.com (W2fca@cs.com)
Date: Mon Jun 30 06:58:34 2003
I can't be sure since I don't do much FM, but during non-contest times I've heard activity on 146.55 and 146.58 between groups of people that can hear each other without repeaters. They disappear dur
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02165.html (7,698 bytes)

4. [VHFcontesting] W3ZZ & Activity Level in June ARRL VHF QSO Party (score: 1)
Author: ka5cvh@ka5cvh.com (Mike Urich)
Date: Mon Jun 30 09:57:13 2003
One aspect I had hoped we would see did not seem to materialize at least here in NE Florida--it seemed FM simplex activity was still next to non-existant. But I had limited operating time, maybe ther
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02167.html (8,427 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu