Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+VUCC\s+Card\s+Checking\s+Question\s+comments\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+VUCC\s+Card\s+Checking\s+Question\s+comments\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] VUCC Card Checking Question comments (score: 1): Author: "Fisher, Mike" <Mike.Fisher@marriott.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:54:52 -0500; The past few days emails do make for an lively debate on the VUCC process. For the record I have my VUCC on 6m and on Satellite. I have had some of the QSL cards show up 2 years or more after the QSO; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-01/msg00204.html (8,525 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] VUCC Card Checking Question comments (score: 1): Author: Paul Kiesel <k7cw@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 09:31:14 -0800 (PST); There is one other factor that's important. If someone receives an award that he doesn't deserve, his call is included with those of persons who earned the award legitimately, thus effectively dimini; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-01/msg00205.html (9,579 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]