Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+VHF\s+sked\s+alternative\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] VHF sked alternative (score: 1)
Author: k4gun@comcast.net
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:50:44 +0000
In examining how I did in the recently completed VHF contest, I keep hearing a similar comment from people. There were a lot of people looking for me when I was in a couple of rare grids, but I never
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-01/msg00230.html (8,400 bytes)

2. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF sked alternative (score: 1)
Author: aa4zz@aol.com
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 17:37:37 -0500
I've often thought a 75 meter (or 40 meter) frequency would make sense for rover announcements and it would not violate the "non amateur" rule. 73 Paul AA4ZZ In examining how I did in the recently co
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-01/msg00231.html (9,330 bytes)

3. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF sked alternative (score: 1)
Author: "John D'Ausilio" <jdausilio@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:20:41 -0500
Steve, what Xtof and I usually do is make noise on one 2M frequency and pretty much stay there. Once everybody knows you're there every contest, they tune by once in a while and you get enough busine
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-01/msg00232.html (7,782 bytes)

4. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF sked alternative (score: 1)
Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 07:38:12 -0800
In all contests - people miss working mults on various bands - this happens in HF contests and VHF contests. The folks that tend to work more multipliers and more contacts tend to be the ones that wo
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-01/msg00236.html (10,854 bytes)

5. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF sked alternative (score: 1)
Author: Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 08:45:37 -0800 (PST)
In line below.. Check Mark. Check Mark. Check Mark. Check Mark. Check Mark. Check Mark. Check Mark. It never fails that when I try to take a quick food break I will hear a new station pop up just as
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-01/msg00238.html (12,310 bytes)

6. [VHFcontesting] VHF Sked Alternative (score: 1)
Author: Philip Theis <phil@k3tuf.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 12:09:43 -0500
Steve, It is really good to see your enthusiasm as a new rover. We have been working with some of the old time rovers like John (w1rt) and Rick (k1ds) and many others. They always publish the liason
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-01/msg00239.html (8,118 bytes)

7. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF sked alternative (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 11:22:57 -0600 (CST)
This can be summed up with "highly directional antennas". On HF, for instance in SS, if I call CQ with a dipole, a good part of the target audience is going to hear me. Even with a beam, if I'm point
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-01/msg00241.html (9,747 bytes)

8. [VHFcontesting] VHF sked alternative (score: 1)
Author: "Lee Bradshaw" <k4uva@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 12:26:36 -0500
I was listening out for you Steve but unfortunately, I never heard you. I did however hear K4QI make a qso with you on Saturday night and I believe you were in FM26 at the time. I heard him but not y
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-01/msg00242.html (31,491 bytes)

9. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF sked alternative (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 10:29:47 -0800 (PST)
-- Original Message -- -- There is no definition of this term ("spotting") to know if it happens or not. Yes, it is illegal for many contests/categories, but it has no common definition. Ev, W2EV ___
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-01/msg00244.html (8,102 bytes)

10. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF sked alternative (score: 1)
Author: "Chet, N8RA" <chetsubaccount@snet.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:06:06 -0500
This is precisely why I put up the antenna that I did for 2M contesting. It is a four stack of 3 element yagis. It analyzes to have 14.6 dBi of gain with a 60 degree horizontal beamwidth to the -3 dB
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-01/msg00245.html (10,210 bytes)

11. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF sked alternative (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Worsham" <wa4kxy@bellsouth.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:07:38 -0500
While I agree with much of what you say in principle, it is almost impossible to make contacts on the higher (microwave) bands with out making schedules. It is hard enough with the schedule! Speaking
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-01/msg00248.html (13,967 bytes)

12. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF sked alternative (score: 1)
Author: "John D'Ausilio" <jdausilio@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:17:15 -0500
Wow Jim, I can't disagree more! I give out schedules with tongue firmly planted in cheek to those that insist, but my experience in the last few years is that we hardly ever complete on them. (caveat
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-01/msg00249.html (9,357 bytes)

13. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF sked alternative (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Worsham" <wa4kxy@bellsouth.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:35:29 -0500
All I can say is look at were you are and were we are. If we ever made a random contact on a microwave band I don't remember it. Let me clarify one thing though. Like you, many times we will work som
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-01/msg00250.html (10,234 bytes)

14. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF sked alternative (score: 1)
Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:11:44 -0800
I was referring to pre-contest or schedules made over the internet or telephone during the contest. I have no issue with schedules made on say 2 meters for some later time during the contest or movin
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-01/msg00254.html (9,509 bytes)

15. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF sked alternative (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:00:00 -0600 (CST)
I ALMOST made one once. I heard W9ZIH calling CQ on 10 GHz and called him. He answered someone else and then disappeared. I found out later that he was just running a CQ message on his keyer while th
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-01/msg00258.html (9,754 bytes)

16. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF sked alternative (score: 1)
Author: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:12:51 -0700
That would be the driver's seat, for us rovers... LOL! And actually, your butt hurts after almost two days of driving... Standing NEXT to the vehicle is an option if the WX is good and the wind's not
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-01/msg00301.html (9,079 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu