Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+VHF\s+CONTESTS\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+VHF\s+CONTESTS\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] VHF CONTESTS (score: 1): Author: k2uop@raven-villages.net (Thomas Viselli); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:40 2003; I have been reading the posts for a few days, and I fell that I have a little bit to add. I will try to make this as short as possible because enough space has already been used on the subject. I hav; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01565.html (9,018 bytes)
2. [VHFcontesting] Vhf Contests (score: 1): Author: Larry Lambert NØLL <n0ll@ruraltel.net>; Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 22:46:53 -0600; Tom, I'll bet u are getting all kinds of comments on the recommendations and goals concerning the three ARRL VHF contests. Some guys have some pretty strong feelings about this. Out here in the stick; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-02/msg00103.html (8,585 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] Vhf Contests (score: 1): Author: "Ron Hooper" <w4wa@alltel.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 22:21:16 -0500; I was also on the CAC and remember the vote Larry mentioned. The ARRL Membership Service Committee (MSC) would not go along with the CAC recommendation. I am not sure why or if they gave a reason but; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-02/msg00113.html (8,185 bytes)
4. Re: [VHFcontesting] Vhf Contests (score: 1): Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 21:39:06 -0500; Ron Hooper wrote: I was serving the Midwest Division on the Contest Advisory Committee back in the 90s. The CAC voted 11 to 3 to change the rover scoring rules back to the pre 1995 rules. When our re; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-02/msg00117.html (8,946 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]