Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Time\s+to\s+Change\s+VUCC\s+Rules\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Time to Change VUCC Rules? (score: 1)
Author: "Les Rayburn" <les@highnoonfilm.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 21:18:29 -0600
Considering the recent rules changes for ARRL VHF/UHF Contest regarding optical communications, isnt it time to also change the VUCC Award credits to better reflect the current thinking (and state of
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-11/msg00015.html (8,797 bytes)

2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Time to Change VUCC Rules? (score: 1)
Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 17:27:31 -0800 (PST)
Hi Les, So far, I don't see what the problem is. What exactly is it that you think is going to be ruled ineligible, and why? 73, Ken Alexander VE3HLS _______________________________________________ V
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-11/msg00018.html (10,193 bytes)

3. Re: [VHFcontesting] Time to Change VUCC Rules? (score: 1)
Author: "Les Rayburn" <les@highnoonfilm.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 20:36:25 -0600
Ken, I doubt that any card checker would rule contacts made using high power LED arrays, which are the state of the art in optical communications as ineligible for award credit. But under the current
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-11/msg00019.html (11,046 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu