Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Thanks\s+for\s+changing\s+the\s+weekend\s+for\s+VHF\s+Contest\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Thanks\s+for\s+changing\s+the\s+weekend\s+for\s+VHF\s+Contest\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Thanks for changing the weekend for VHF Contest (score: 1): Author: James Duffey <jamesduffey@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 10:08:21 -0600; Bart - This is great news! I think club participation should pick up without the conflict with the CQ WW 160 contest and the chances for late season Es is a lot better. Still not good for Es, but a l; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2016-08/msg00039.html (7,417 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Thanks for changing the weekend for VHF Contest (score: 1): Author: Dan via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 23:26:49 -0400; This is absolutely the right thing to do! The RTTY Roundup can be any weekend in January and not be affected by propagation while the VHF event potentially benefits greatly from better winter Es earl; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2016-08/msg00040.html (9,365 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] Thanks for changing the weekend for VHF Contest (score: 1): Author: Jeff Stai <wk6i.jeff@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 20:54:18 -0700; No, please no. Go ahead and move the VHF to the first weekend, but NAQP phone is the third weekend. There is too much overlap with roundup and NAQP participants. But if putting VHF and NAQP phone on; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2016-08/msg00041.html (10,406 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]