Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+TU\s+for\s+6m\s+digital\s+info\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+TU\s+for\s+6m\s+digital\s+info\!\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] TU for 6m digital info! (score: 1): Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>; Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 12:24:56 -0400 (EDT); Thanks Ev and JT for the freq info. 50.290 sounds more like what I remember. Makes me wonder how many Canadian hams are up on 50.7? I guess I'd better check there too...briefly! Unfortunately, I'll b; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-10/msg00049.html (7,380 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] TU for 6m digital info! (score: 1): Author: "JT Croteau" <jt.n1ese@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 12:29:38 -0400; Anything is possible with QRP and PSK. I worked Moscow with 5W on 20M the other day with a hamstick dipole inside my shack. On 6M I will be putting ~20W into an omni directional antenna so who knows.; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-10/msg00050.html (6,998 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]