Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Stacked\s+Squalos\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Stacked\s+Squalos\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Stacked Squalos? (score: 1): Author: "Joshua M. Arritt" <jarritt@vt.edu>; Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 17:56:12 -0400; A couple folks in the Virginia Tech ham club are considering adding omni-directional receive antennas for 6, 2, and possibly 432 (and 222, once I get my xverter running) to augment the modest yagi fa; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-10/msg00005.html (7,244 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Stacked Squalos? (score: 1): Author: "David" <ke4yyd@gtcom.net>; Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 19:19:02 -0400; I would suggest 4 element horizontal yagis pointed in the key direction would serve your purpose better. I have several 4 element yagi arrays on the side of my tower plus some omni directional arrays; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-10/msg00006.html (9,345 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] Stacked Squalos? (score: 1): Author: Alex <extraham@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 07:14:51 -0400 (GMT-04:00); Halos, Squalos, and whatever cute name they come up with for these antennas do not have an omnidirectional pattern, no matter what they claim. (Yes, a local ham and I tested them.) In order for a hal; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-10/msg00010.html (10,795 bytes)
4. Re: [VHFcontesting] Stacked Squalos? (score: 1): Author: Alex <extraham@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 07:18:57 -0400 (GMT-04:00); That's an excellent setup, David. Do you switch in the schack or remotely on the tower? 4 element yagis have a wide enough 3dB beam width to cover about 270 degrees with considerable gain over a dipo; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-10/msg00011.html (8,179 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]