- 1. [VHFcontesting] Sept Contest and WSJT, Etc (score: 1)
- Author: timm@cccomm.net (Tim Marek)
- Date: Thu Jun 19 16:43:49 2003
- Hi Folks, As long as the contact can take place in a reasonable amount of time, say the time a normal voice MS sked or a CW EME sked takes to complete, then I have no issue with HSMS, HSJT, or any di
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00182.html (9,430 bytes)
- 2. [VHFcontesting] Sept Contest and WSJT, Etc (score: 1)
- Author: k7cw@yahoo.com (Paul Kiesel)
- Date: Thu Jun 19 16:43:49 2003
- I don't want to be categorized as anti-fun, but why not time-averaged QSOs? Surely you don't think guys doing this are going to be a threat to the "serious" contesters! 73 de Paul, K7CW http://lists.
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00198.html (10,838 bytes)
- 3. [VHFcontesting] Sept Contest and WSJT, Etc (score: 1)
- Author: timm@cccomm.net (Tim Marek)
- Date: Thu Jun 19 16:43:49 2003
- Hi Folks, As long as the contact can take place in a reasonable amount of time, say the time a normal voice MS sked or a CW EME sked takes to complete, then I have no issue with HSMS, HSJT, or any di
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2001-09/msg00011.html (9,461 bytes)
- 4. [VHFcontesting] Sept Contest and WSJT, Etc (score: 1)
- Author: k7cw@yahoo.com (Paul Kiesel)
- Date: Thu Jun 19 16:43:49 2003
- I don't want to be categorized as anti-fun, but why not time-averaged QSOs? Surely you don't think guys doing this are going to be a threat to the "serious" contesters! 73 de Paul, K7CW http://lists.
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2001-09/msg00019.html (10,849 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu