Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Rover\s+stuff\s+\-\s+Continued\s+discussion\s+of\s+rover\s+rules\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Rover stuff - Continued discussion of rover rules (score: 1)
Author: jcplatt1@mmm.com
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:41:58 -0600
"Should I be punished or excluded or treated like a leper because I figured out a way to Make Big Scores?" Hi Gerry. I don't think anyone is going to "punish or exclude". No way. The discussion point
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-11/msg00129.html (10,991 bytes)

2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Rover stuff - Continued discussion of rover rules (score: 1)
Author: "Gerry Hull" <gerry@w1ve.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:58:40 -0500
Hi Jon, These are very good points. But, unless I missed something, plenty of people are winning Sections, Divsions, etc while some are placing at the top nationally with a new technique. So, their i
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-11/msg00130.html (13,619 bytes)

3. Re: [VHFcontesting] Rover stuff - Continued discussion of rover rules (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <aa5jg@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:55:19 -0800 (PST)
My concern is more about the attitude that there is only one way to properly operate in (or at least win) a contest, and if you don't do it my way, we need to change the rules so everyone must do it
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-11/msg00131.html (9,792 bytes)

4. Re: [VHFcontesting] Rover stuff - Continued discussion of rover rules (score: 1)
Author: Dan Evans <dan.evans@insightbb.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 11:04:12 -0500
After drinking my coffee, and giving the issue a bit more thought I tend to agree with Jon. My reasoning is pretty simple. I have nothing against grid circling. If they enjoy it, great! However, I do
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-11/msg00152.html (16,390 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu