Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Re\:\s+VHFcontesting\s+rules\s+\-\s+hmmmm\!\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Re: VHFcontesting rules - hmmmm! (score: 1)
Author: johngeig@yahoo.com (John Geiger)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:20 2003
I think that the ARRL used to have it correct. Under the old rover rules, you started counting multipliers over again whenever you entered a new grid square. That encouraged people to activate as man
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01305.html (16,518 bytes)

2. [VHFcontesting] Re: VHFcontesting rules - hmmmm! (score: 1)
Author: wa2voi@minnmicro.com (Donn Baker)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:20 2003
In the early/mid 90's, a couple of Rovers in NE did a perfectly legal thing in the January Contest: they "grid circled." That is, A was in grid 1, while B was in 1, 2, 3, and then 4. A moved to grid
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01311.html (8,313 bytes)

3. [VHFcontesting] Re: VHFcontesting rules - hmmmm! (score: 1)
Author: ezimmerm@erols.com (Eugene Zimmerman)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:20 2003
Donn has it right. The changes in the rover rules have nothing to do with the desires of the rovers but everything to do with the politics of club scores. If you all remember, there was a much more o
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01328.html (9,746 bytes)

4. [VHFcontesting] Re: VHFcontesting rules - hmmmm! (score: 1)
Author: n6nz@n6nz.net (Dave N6NZ)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:21 2003
Sheeseh, rover rule controversy again. I'll try to repress both the yawn and the rising voice and keep my comments "between the rails". Back when the rule change went through, I was an active rover.
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01336.html (14,853 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu