Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Re\:\s+Rule\s+precedence\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Re\:\s+Rule\s+precedence\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Re: Rule precedence (score: 1): Author: Richard Clem <clem.law@usa.net>; Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 11:55:35 -0600; I guess I didn't express my point very artfully, so let me try again. I agree, since there is no multi-op rover category, the 30 hams in the bus would not be eligible to compete in any category. The; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-01/msg00042.html (8,112 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]