Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Re\:\s+Rule\s+precedence\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Re\:\s+Rule\s+precedence\.\.\.\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Re: Rule precedence... (score: 1): Author: James Ewen <jewen@shaw.ca>; Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 23:59:28 -0700; OOPS... pressed the wrong button. Most people have pointed me at 3.5 in the General rules which allows family members to use the same equipment under different calls. The VHF rules also point out tha; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-01/msg00034.html (7,958 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Re: Rule precedence... (score: 1): Author: ADUHAWK@aol.com; Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 08:59:01 EST; JAMES -- (ALL CAPS FOR EMPHASIS) PAT AND I HAVE NEVER WORKED EACH OTHER. YOU CANNOT WORK EACH OTHER ON THE SAME EQUIPMENT AND WE HAVE NEVER BROUGHT ALONG OTHER EQUIPMENT TO WORK EACH OTHER. FRANKLY,; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-01/msg00036.html (7,521 bytes)
3. [VHFcontesting] Re: Rule precedence... (score: 1): Author: Richard Clem <clem.law@usa.net>; Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 11:44:02 -0600; Can you honestly say that the only reason that two family members operating as a rover station using two callsigns is not attempting to manufacture contacts? Actually, that's the reason most rovers g; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-01/msg00038.html (9,776 bytes)
4. Fw: [VHFcontesting] Re: Rule precedence... (score: 1): Author: "Eugene Zimmerman" <ezimmerm@erols.com>; Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 23:11:24 -0500; I am forwarding this message on behalf of VE6SRV because he has had a problem posting it to the reflector. If you wish to reply, do so to the reflector or to jewen@shaw.ca . DO NOT REPLY DIRECTLY TO; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-01/msg00039.html (11,817 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]