Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Re\:\s+Is\s+this\s+a\s+QSO\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Re\:\s+Is\s+this\s+a\s+QSO\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Re: Is this a QSO? (score: 1): Author: cboone@earthlink.net (Christopher Boone); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:43 2003; IRLP ONLY provides a wireline link between RF systems...ECHOlink and others DO NOT as they allow PCs to talk directly between each other and on to the air...(which I have serious problems with...rega; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01703.html (8,115 bytes)
2. [VHFcontesting] Re: Is this a QSO? (score: 1): Author: w9sz@prairienet.org (Zack Widup); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:43 2003; It may be a valid "contact" but it doesn't count for some awards. For DXCC, VUCC, etc. the QSO has to be directly by RADIO entirely - antenna to antenna by RF propagation. No computers in the middle.; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01704.html (9,483 bytes)
3. [VHFcontesting] Re: Is this a QSO? (score: 1): Author: n9dg@yahoo.com (Duane Grotophorst); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:43 2003; Interesting topic and a number of equally interesting comments. The key guidelines that I would go by are (theses are primarily in the context of the existing VHF awards and contesting): 1. All elem; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01710.html (10,906 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]