Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Re\:\s+Ideal\s+contesting\s+rig\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Re: Ideal contesting rig (score: 1)
Author: ka5cvh@ka5cvh.com (Mike Urich)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:35 2003
I had to jump on here and say that I agree with John in this case. Where is that 6/222/903 rig or HT? Surplus 900 MHz becoming more readily available but don't look for any SSB or other modes. Mike U
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01781.html (7,979 bytes)

2. [VHFcontesting] Re: Ideal contesting rig (score: 1)
Author: W2fca@cs.com (W2fca@cs.com)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:34 2003
<< 1. 6 meters, 2 meters, 70cm and 23 cm out of the box I would think 6 thru 70 cm would be better. You can also do scatter and au on 222. << 2. 100 watts on 6,2, 70cm, and 20 on 23cm You're talking
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01957.html (8,066 bytes)

3. [VHFcontesting] Re: Ideal contesting rig (score: 1)
Author: caitlynmaire@earthlink.net (caitlynmaire@earthlink.net)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:34 2003
Hi, The closest thing today would be the Icom IC-970J, the Japanese version of the IC-970H, which is still sold in Japan. We Americans wouldn't pay the big bucks so it was discontinued here. No 6m, b
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01964.html (7,895 bytes)

4. [VHFcontesting] Re: Ideal contesting rig (score: 1)
Author: johngeig@yahoo.com (John Geiger)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:34 2003
I agree that the Icom IC970H is considered the top of the line VHF/UHF rig, and I believe that it is, and it still commands a very good price. The one shortcoming with it is that it is a satellite ri
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01966.html (9,357 bytes)

5. [VHFcontesting] Re: Ideal contesting rig (score: 1)
Author: caitlynmaire@earthlink.net (caitlynmaire@earthlink.net)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:35 2003
Hi, John, and everyone else, Very interesting discussion... I believe Icom assumes that if you have an IC-970H you will also have one of their high end HF rigs, all of which have 6 meters. Considerin
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01969.html (11,854 bytes)

6. [VHFcontesting] Re: Ideal contesting rig (score: 1)
Author: johngeig@yahoo.com (John Geiger)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:35 2003
Hi Caity, and others, I was noticing the same thing the other day. Icom does seem to have given up on 220, as I don't think they make any rig that covers 220 now. Don't know if they got burned too ba
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01970.html (14,666 bytes)

7. [VHFcontesting] Re: Ideal contesting rig (score: 1)
Author: david@wb1cmg.mv.com (David M. Upton)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:35 2003
I had to jump on here and say that I agree with John in this case. Where is that 6/222/903 rig or HT? Where is the innovation or at least something different than 2/432 occasionally 1296? I bugged ev
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01977.html (16,631 bytes)

8. [VHFcontesting] Re: Ideal contesting rig (score: 1)
Author: johngeig@yahoo.com (John Geiger)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:35 2003
Hi David, and others. I think you hit upon a important but discouraging poing David. I dont think that the equipment manufactures really listen to what hams want. I don't know how they come up with t
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01978.html (18,546 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu