Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Re\:\s+ARRL\s+VHF\s+Contest\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Re: ARRL VHF Contest (score: 1)
Author: n9dg@yahoo.com (Duane Grotophorst)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:44 2003
How about this for a slightly wacky idea: The ARRL could "enter" the non log submitters in absentia, it would really be just a matter of extracting the call sign, Q, and multiplier data from all thos
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01719.html (10,674 bytes)

2. [VHFcontesting] Re: ARRL VHF Contest (score: 1)
Author: timm@cccomm.net (Tim Marek)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:44 2003
How about this idea... Get the league to release the ENTIRE log database file per contest to those who participate so we can do our own analysis of activity. Or better yet, since THEY already have th
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01720.html (12,637 bytes)

3. [VHFcontesting] Re: ARRL VHF Contest (score: 1)
Author: mph@swcp.com (Mike Hasselbeck)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:44 2003
All the points Tim made about ARRL losing interest in VHF contests seem very valid to me. I still haven't heard a solid reason why CQ can't pick up these contests...I get the sense that perhaps peopl
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01721.html (8,211 bytes)

4. [VHFcontesting] Re: ARRL VHF Contest (score: 1)
Author: johngeig@yahoo.com (John Geiger)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:44 2003
So for the June contest we should have a common place to send logs in addition to the ARRL. Whoever chooses to receive and work with the logs can at least give us a picture of the true contest activi
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01722.html (11,329 bytes)

5. [VHFcontesting] Re: ARRL VHF Contest (score: 1)
Author: kg4qdz@arrl.net (KG4QDZ)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:44 2003
Since these stations don't care to submit in the first place, it's highly doubtful any would "want to be sure all their Q's were properly submitted". And, since they would be in a separate 'deadbeat'
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01723.html (10,051 bytes)

6. [VHFcontesting] Re: ARRL VHF Contest (score: 1)
Author: w2fca@cs.com (w2fca@cs.com)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:44 2003
Probably wouldn't happen because of "privacy" issues. There are some who consider that giving away their competative edge. Also, it might show that K7XXX had 10 bands but only worked W8ZZZ from 12 gr
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01724.html (8,969 bytes)

7. [VHFcontesting] Re: ARRL VHF Contest (score: 1)
Author: geoiii@kkn.net (George Fremin III)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:44 2003
I am not sure I understand how you get to this conclusion. The article that sparked this entire thread was written by W3ZZ the new and current editor of the "World Above 50 Mhz" coloumn in QST. He wa
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01725.html (8,982 bytes)

8. [VHFcontesting] Re: ARRL VHF Contest (score: 1)
Author: timm@cccomm.net (Tim Marek)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:44 2003
My reply is imbedded within the original text below... Tim -- Original Message -- From: <w2fca@cs.com> To: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com> Cc: <vhf@w6yx.stanford.edu> Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2003 1
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01726.html (10,681 bytes)

9. [VHFcontesting] Re: ARRL VHF Contest (score: 1)
Author: mhoffman@microwavedata.com (Hoffman, Mark)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:44 2003
FOLKS! We're going the wrong direction with this! ARRL-Bashing isn't going to fix a damn thing! If you care, DO something about it. Don't just keep writing about how the ARRL is secretly trying to pu
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01727.html (12,858 bytes)

10. [VHFcontesting] Re: ARRL VHF Contest (score: 1)
Author: w2fca@cs.com (w2fca@cs.com)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:44 2003
This was suggested before and there was a big hue and cry about the privacy issue. This isn't my idea, this was the complaint of a number of the higher scoring people. It would be interesting to send
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01728.html (9,204 bytes)

11. [VHFcontesting] Re: ARRL VHF Contest (score: 1)
Author: W6OAL@aol.com (W6OAL@aol.com)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:44 2003
Timm, The first word of your post "Get" as in get the League, contaminated your entire post. You are not going to get the League to do any thing unless it is HF related and then the magnificent few a
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01730.html (8,622 bytes)

12. [VHFcontesting] Re: ARRL VHF Contest (score: 1)
Author: johngeig@yahoo.com (John Geiger)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:44 2003
I disagree about the ARRL only caring about HF. The League loves 2 meter FM, packet, APRS, and echolink more than anything else. If we could find a way to incorportate echolink into the VHF contest,
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01731.html (10,158 bytes)

13. [VHFcontesting] Re: ARRL VHF Contest (score: 1)
Author: mhoffman@microwavedata.com (Hoffman, Mark)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:44 2003
Uh, Is this the VHF Contesting reflector? Sounds more like "THE ARRL SUCKS, AND HERE'S WHY" list. NOBODY, I mean NOBODY was happy that scores were pulled out of the mag. It WAS the wrong move, in our
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01732.html (12,048 bytes)

14. [VHFcontesting] Re: ARRL VHF Contest (score: 1)
Author: k8cc@comcast.net (David A. Pruett)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:44 2003
The wild diversions of this thread might be entertaining if it wasn't so ill informed. I have to agree with K2AXX - everybody take a deep breath and get a grip. I am on the ARRL Contest Advisory Comm
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01734.html (8,981 bytes)

15. [VHFcontesting] Re: ARRL VHF Contest (score: 1)
Author: johngeig@yahoo.com (John Geiger)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:44 2003
And the benefit of having photos with QST or the word HAM in the business name is....? 73s John NE0P http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting _______________________________________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01735.html (8,266 bytes)

16. [VHFcontesting] Re: ARRL VHF Contest (score: 1)
Author: geoiii@kkn.net (George Fremin III)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:44 2003
I guess I get a diffrent version of QST than you guys do - mine all seem to have the "World Above 50 Mhz" in them - this is three pages of space *every* month devoted to VHF/UHF weak signal topics. I
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01737.html (10,185 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu