Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Re\:\s+\[BEACONet\]\s+Did\s+you\s+work\s+EL86\s+in\s+the\s+6m\s+Sprint\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Re\:\s+\[BEACONet\]\s+Did\s+you\s+work\s+EL86\s+in\s+the\s+6m\s+Sprint\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Re: [BEACONet] Did you work EL86 in the 6m Sprint? (score: 1): Author: kd4evb@yahoo.com (Jeff Thomas - KD4EVB); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:50 2003; Worked about every grid in FL last night, had planned to work the sprint and tuning the bands earlier in the evening, including the beacon portion 50.060-50.080 gave many indicators some form of open; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02355.html (11,596 bytes)
2. [VHFcontesting] Re: [BEACONet] Did you work EL86 in the 6m Sprint? (score: 1): Author: w2ev@arrl.net (Ev Tupis (W2EV)); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:50 2003; I suppose one can argue both sides of the PSK31 fence... depending on who you talk to PSK31 is capable of indicateing both sub-SSB quality paths and not. The beauty of The BEACONet Project experiment; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02361.html (7,496 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]