Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Re\:\s+\"multi\-op\s+rover\?\"\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Re\:\s+\"multi\-op\s+rover\?\"\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Re: "multi-op rover?" (score: 1): Author: rick1ds@hotmail.com (Rick R); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:28 2003; re: "multi-op" out of the same vehicle I remember having two hams visit our FD site in their van with a 6m & 2m station. Although there was no "rover" class then, the way that they both operated simu; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01057.html (7,688 bytes)
2. [VHFcontesting] Re: "multi-op rover?" (score: 1): Author: k1dh1@hotmail.com (Donald Huntington); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:28 2003; yYou are almost right, Rick..Only one signal on the air on any one band. In other words 2m SSB cannot be on the air the same time as 2m FM. Been there, done that. 73 Don K1DH (6m op W2SZ) To: <vhfcon; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01058.html (8,965 bytes)
3. [VHFcontesting] Re: "multi-op rover?" (score: 1): Author: kt1vt@hotmail.com (Frank Alwine); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:28 2003; I believe the rule is no simultaneous transmissions on the *same* band. 73, Frank Frank KT1VT / FN34kp Vermont _________________________________________________________________ MSN 8 with e-mail vir; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01059.html (7,250 bytes)
4. [VHFcontesting] Re: "multi-op rover?" (score: 1): Author: ka5cvh@ka5cvh.com (Mike Urich, KA5CVH); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:28 2003; I believe that to be correct. You can't be on 50.125 SSB with one rig and 52.525 FM with another. Mike Urich, KA5CVH www.ka5cvh.com LaPorte TX EL-29 Life is too short for QRP!; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01060.html (7,216 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]