Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+QSO\s+Breakdowns\s+by\s+Grid\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+QSO\s+Breakdowns\s+by\s+Grid\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] QSO Breakdowns by Grid (score: 1): Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com (Jimk8mr@aol.com); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:55 2003; Several people here, and/or on the 3830 claimed score mailing list, have included breakdowns of number of stations worked in each grid. I find this information quite interesting, though several peopl; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02120.html (7,117 bytes)
2. [VHFcontesting] QSO Breakdowns by Grid (score: 1): Author: geoiii@kkn.net (George Fremin III); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:55 2003; Ok here is our list. Of course just because we (or anyone else) only worked one station in a grid does not mean that there are not tons of people on in that grid. I think a better way to approch this; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02121.html (13,823 bytes)
3. [VHFcontesting] QSO Breakdowns by Grid (score: 1): Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com (Jimk8mr@aol.com); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:55 2003; George, Thanks for the info. Agreed that such information complied from a lot of stations in a lot of places would be better. But yours is a start! I don't think I'll use your raw numbers to plan an; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02122.html (7,346 bytes)
4. [VHFcontesting] QSO Breakdowns by Grid (score: 1): Author: spederson@yahoo.com (Scott Pederson); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:55 2003; Probably the best thing would be to collect all of the logs from the ARRL, and (just like TDXS does for TQP) display a grid compilation showing which grids had low activity. As a rover, this would be; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02124.html (14,493 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]