Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+PACK\s+ROVEing\s+\-\s+How\s+about\s+a\s+change\s+in\s+scoringmethod\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [VHFcontesting] PACK ROVEing - How about a change in scoringmethod (score: 1)
Author: "John (JK) Kalenowsky, K9JK" <k9jk73@msn.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 21:47:32 -0500
OR...look at possible scoring methodology changes. First let me make it clear that I am NOT "slamming" or in any way trying to disparage what N6NB and crew have done...I, personally, am STILL impress
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-07/msg00107.html (12,005 bytes)

2. Re: [VHFcontesting] PACK ROVEing - How about a change in scoringmethod (score: 1)
Author: KY1K <ky1k@pivot.net>
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 10:55:00 -0400
2 major problems exist: 1) Rovers need to be scores with rovers. Trying to fudge the numbers so that an outstanding rover effort has about as many points as an outstanding multiop effort is wrong. Y
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00000.html (8,252 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu