Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+New\s+Thoughts\s+on\s+all\s+of\s+this\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+New\s+Thoughts\s+on\s+all\s+of\s+this\!\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] New Thoughts on all of this! (score: 1): Author: martho@ameritech.net (Mark); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:46 2003; Minimum Distance for QSO's.... I live in the Chicago area where there is a high density of hams. Why should be punished by a rule change? I have 3 stations less than 1KM from me. I have worked to rec; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02215.html (8,135 bytes)
2. [VHFcontesting] New Thoughts on all of this! (score: 1): Author: johngeig@yahoo.com (John Geiger); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:46 2003; It is interesting in that the original original thread in this line was lamenting the declining number of logs in ARRL VHF contests. We are now seeing discussions on how this log and that log should; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02220.html (10,534 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]