Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Multiple\s+Calls\,Same\s+Rover\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Multiple\s+Calls\,Same\s+Rover\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [VHFcontesting] Multiple Calls,Same Rover (score: 1): Author: <w0eea@sbbco.net>; Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 21:27:38 -0600; Ev, Tom, Mark and others who find this topic of interest, After I posted my last message I went back and reread the relavent rules. Rules 2.3.1 and 2.3.2 are general prohibitions. Rule 1.3 restates t; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-09/msg00049.html (7,377 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Multiple Calls,Same Rover (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>; Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 23:13:13 -0500 (CDT); I seem to recall this question coming up before. It may have had to do with the K0PG/N9ILT family roving team in my area. At any rate, I seem to recall an ARRL contest official making a statement tha; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-09/msg00051.html (7,508 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] Multiple Calls,Same Rover (score: 1): Author: "John (JK) Kalenowsky, K9JK" <k9jk73@msn.com>; Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2005 08:05:07 -0500; All, It is *my* understanding that a ruling or rulings HAVE been made by HQ regarding this topic. Perhaps the "commissioner" (to use Ev's terminology) who I believe reads and monitors this reflector; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-09/msg00052.html (8,967 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]