Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+More\s+Roving\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+More\s+Roving\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] More Roving (score: 1): Author: James Duffey <jamesduffey@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 21:29:52 -0700; To answer Jamess question : The issue is more the manipulation of the rules and lack of forethought in the creation of the rules. That being taking something that was meant to encourage new people to; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-11/msg00041.html (9,418 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] More Roving (score: 1): Author: "R. Michael West" <k6nc@saciplaw.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 05:17:03 +0000; James: We agree with you that the Limited Rover class was not necessarily intended for beginners, although it does provide an entry level class in terms of equipment/power limitations. Personally, I; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-11/msg00044.html (12,021 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] More Roving (score: 1): Author: frank bechdoldt <k3uhf@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 21:18:49 -0800; I respectfully disagree with Duffy, I think he a nice guy, though... and encourage him to keep roving in out here in the middle of nowhere. Actually there is a spirit and intent of all rules made by; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-11/msg00045.html (13,095 bytes)
4. Re: [VHFcontesting] More Roving (score: 1): Author: k4gun@comcast.net; Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:03:34 +0000 (UTC); I think we may be making this a LOT more complicated than it needs to be. The 4 point issue wouldn't be an issue were it not for the grid squaring. They couldn't possibly make enough contacts on th; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-11/msg00057.html (12,665 bytes)
5. Re: [VHFcontesting] More Roving (score: 1): Author: Marshall Williams <k5qe@sabinenet.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:25:56 -0600; Hello to all.....Steve may be onto something with these proposed rules. CONCERNING RULE 1: I think that I would allow 20 contacts for both the Limited Rover and Rover classes. I see no need to limit; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-11/msg00068.html (12,780 bytes)
6. Re: [VHFcontesting] More Roving (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <aa5jg@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 10:44:29 -0800 (PST); We will never get new hams / new rovers to In terms of single op low power operating, the system is already rigged against me: 1. I live in an area with much less VHF activity than the Northeast or W; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-11/msg00070.html (9,909 bytes)
7. Re: [VHFcontesting] More Roving (score: 1): Author: k4gun@comcast.net; Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:54:48 +0000 (UTC); Hmmm... I don't see a real difference between pack roving and grid circling. I'm willing to consider that there is one, but the end result is really the same. I'm also skeptical of allowing more th; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-11/msg00073.html (14,127 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]