Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+KB6KQ\s+FT\-100\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+KB6KQ\s+FT\-100\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] KB6KQ FT-100 (score: 1): Author: Michael Urich <ka5cvh@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 14:15:30 -0800 (PST); OK maybe I should have added this to the original post so here goes. Yes, I tried a different piece of coax (twice) that was in service on a higher band just to make sure. All three pieces were virtu; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-01/msg00060.html (7,734 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] KB6KQ FT-100 (score: 1): Author: John Byerly <mtnlion@xmtservices.net>; Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 17:34:48 -0800; Michael, I ran into that problem with my "New Style" KB6KQ loop last June contest. What I discovered was that the loading coil inside the matching assembly had come loose at the loop and was causing; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-01/msg00061.html (8,922 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]