Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+K1SIG\/R\s+preliminary\s+results\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+K1SIG\/R\s+preliminary\s+results\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] K1SIG/R preliminary results (score: 1): Author: Chris Lumens <chris@lumensoutdoors.org>; Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 15:57:42 -0400; I need to double check our log, but here's our preliminary results... Call: K1SIG/R Operator(s): KG6CIH, WH6DSN Class: Limited Rover Band QSOs Mults 6: 50 10 2: 46 10 1.25: 24 6 70: 32 7 Total: 152 3; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-09/msg00054.html (10,057 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] K1SIG/R preliminary results (score: 1): Author: "Chet S" <chetsubaccount@snet.net>; Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 16:46:27 -0400; Chris, I use a Comet CF-530 duplexer on my 6M radio for protection. 1.3-90 MHz Low Pass, less than 0.2 dB loss 125-470 MHz High Pass with a small 50 ohm load on this port 45 dB Isolation 600 watts 73; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-09/msg00055.html (7,403 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] K1SIG/R preliminary results (score: 1): Author: Michael Clarson <wv2zow@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 19:31:41 -0400; I've used these as well. Since they are a high pass and low pass filter in one box, the load on the unused port isn't really necessary. They work great to isolate bands. Very low loss. --Mike, WV2ZOW; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-09/msg00059.html (8,395 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]