Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Icom\s+9700\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Icom\s+9700\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Icom 9700 (score: 1): Author: Buddy Morgan via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 08:52:22 -0500; If you have not done so already, do a Google search for Icom IC 9700. - Buddy WB4OMG _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lis; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-11/msg00017.html (6,593 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Icom 9700 (score: 1): Author: Sean Waite <waisean@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 14:13:33 +0000; Expectations are that the radio is going to be expensive, some European stores have it listed at 1500EUR. It looks pretty awesome, and I hope it sells well enough that more companies get back on that; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-11/msg00018.html (7,281 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] Icom 9700 (score: 1): Author: Keith Morehouse <w9rm@calmesapartners.com>; Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 09:50:38 -0700; MY first though when I saw this announced a few months ago ? ...if this is a SDR based direct-sampled radio, there is absolutely NO reason why they could not have a software load for the US/Canada ma; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-11/msg00019.html (7,765 bytes)
4. Re: [VHFcontesting] Icom 9700 (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 11:00:25 -0600; Since it's nowhere near available that's probably just a guess at the MSRP. I thought the exchange was closer to 2:1 but I see that 1500 is US$1800 or so. That's cheap if they don't bother with a "UX; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-11/msg00020.html (8,017 bytes)
5. Re: [VHFcontesting] Icom 9700 (score: 1): Author: Rhinosix via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 17:05:06 -0500; You are right, no tech reasons for not putting in 222 mhz even at reduced 25 watts power except the monitization of another ham band through a FCC auction process. That is the wall the mfg's are up a; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-11/msg00021.html (9,026 bytes)
6. [VHFcontesting] Icom 9700 (score: 1): Author: "Steve $K1IIG$" <stephen.tripp@snet.net>; Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 18:28:01 -0500; What I would like to see is the bottom 4 bands plus 1296 as an option but do not expect it to happen. Regarding the 9700 my concern is will they have power setting per band plus will it have a transv; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-11/msg00022.html (8,987 bytes)
7. Re: [VHFcontesting] Icom 9700 (score: 1): Author: Mark Spencer <mark@alignedsolutions.com>; Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 16:29:04 -0800; The pragmatist in me is happy to see interest in continuing to offer SSB / CW radios that cover frequencies over 144 MHz. But yes coverage of bands such as 222 MHz and 902 MHz would be nice. 73 Mark; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-11/msg00023.html (10,065 bytes)
8. Re: [VHFcontesting] Icom 9700 (score: 1): Author: K7XC Tim Marek <k7xcnv1@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2017 06:39:34 +0000; 222 MHZ requires a PA that works at that freq and to date none of the PA's used work at that frequency very well. 222 just is not a priority for them. 73s de Tim - K7XC - DM09jh... sk _______________; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-11/msg00025.html (11,461 bytes)
9. Re: [VHFcontesting] Icom 9700 (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2017 09:02:21 -0600; I am not familiar with the 9700 but I wonder if the W1GHZ 222 transvertet for the FT817 can be made to work on it? 222 is a great band and even with 10 watts as a Single Op Portable in contests I wor; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-11/msg00026.html (11,225 bytes)
10. Re: [VHFcontesting] Icom 9700 (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2017 09:54:59 -0600; Unreleased. Prototype was shown at Tokyo Hamfair. https://www.n1fd.org/2017/09/18/icom-ic-9700-prototype/ Only 3 antenna ports so likely online 144/432/1296 (and it appears it will really be a triban; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-11/msg00027.html (9,684 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]