Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Icom\s+9100\s+vs\s+9700\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Icom\s+9100\s+vs\s+9700\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Icom 9100 vs 9700 (score: 1): Author: Edward via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 09:41:06 -0700; Has anybody compared freq stability between these two on 1.2 and other bands? I really like the 9100 and would need to justify the purchase of a 9700. Feedback appreciated. 73, Ed NI6S ______________; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-06/msg00120.html (6,776 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Icom 9100 vs 9700 (score: 1): Author: Buddy Morgan via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 17:08:10 +0000 (UTC); Everyone told me that my IC 9100 was very stable, operating FT 8, on 1296.174. I just recently purchased a '9700. With firmware rev 1.10, which synchs every second to an external reference, it is ver; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-06/msg00121.html (7,780 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]