Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+IC9100\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+IC9100\?\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] IC9100? (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 10:17:01 -0600; Anyone have experience with the Icom IC9100? How does it compare to the earlier IC910? I currently have an IC746Pro (IC7400 in some markets) and was disappointed when the IC7410 shipped without 2m. I; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2016-01/msg00032.html (6,805 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] IC9100? (score: 1): Author: Buddy Morgan via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 13:31:19 -0500; I bought one of the first '9100s. I have had few problems with it. Never used a 910 or a 746, so I can't compare. I did have a IC 7000. The 9100 is a much superior radio to the '7000. I have used it; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2016-01/msg00033.html (8,768 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] IC9100? (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 12:36:18 -0600; Thanks! That's an electrifying endorsement! :-D been through at least 1 revision since the first units shipped. I also see complaints about how the USB connection works. Have you used the USB connect; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2016-01/msg00034.html (8,100 bytes)
4. Re: [VHFcontesting] IC9100? (score: 1): Author: Buddy Morgan via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 13:39:29 -0500; I have used the '9100 for SSB, D Star and CW. No digital. - Buddy Thanks! That's an electrifying endorsement! :-D been through at least 1 revision since the first units shipped. I also see complaints; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2016-01/msg00035.html (8,487 bytes)
5. Re: [VHFcontesting] IC9100? (score: 1): Author: "WM3M" <wm3m@live.com>; Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 13:49:21 -0500; Peter, I owned my IC-9100 for a couple years, sold my IC-910H to buy it. Both great rigs, I like the 9100 better, more features, etc. Biggest advantage I see with the 9100 over other rigs, like the F; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2016-01/msg00036.html (8,847 bytes)
6. Re: [VHFcontesting] IC9100? (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 13:00:24 -0600; Emory, How do you like the FT991 overall? Did you have any problems with it? The eham.net reviews have quite a few were some failure occurred with the rig. 73 John AF5CC _____________________________; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2016-01/msg00037.html (9,613 bytes)
7. Re: [VHFcontesting] IC9100? (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 13:57:08 -0600; I see the same in the IC9100 reviews - lots of heat issues with early units. Supposedly fixed now. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _________________________________________; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2016-01/msg00038.html (7,766 bytes)
8. Re: [VHFcontesting] IC9100? (score: 1): Author: "Bob Burns W9BU" <w9bu_lists@rlburns.net>; Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 18:58:13 -0500; I have an IC-9100 that I bought used. I have had problems with the USB port connectivity. Everything works just as advertised with a Windows 7 64-bit laptop, but I cannot get my Windows 7 32-bit shac; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2016-01/msg00039.html (9,753 bytes)
9. Re: [VHFcontesting] IC9100? (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 22:23:56 -0600; Yes, but they changed the XFC button from that nice shade of green to the same off-black as the rest of the keys. Icom makes great radios, but they need a new person in the Division of Front Panel La; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2016-01/msg00040.html (8,564 bytes)
10. Re: [VHFcontesting] IC9100? (score: 1): Author: "Bob Burns W9BU" <w9bu_lists@rlburns.net>; Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 07:05:57 -0500; One of the quirks of the IC-9100 USB interface is that it sets up two COM ports. One for CI-V control and a second one for D-Star data. I think the driver may be a little flaky when it comes to setti; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2016-02/msg00000.html (7,874 bytes)
11. Re: [VHFcontesting] IC9100? (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:32:31 -0500; Another question regarding the IC-9100 ... Anyone using one with a transverter? I've never used a transverter with anything, but since the 9100 doesn't have a transverter output (0 dBm?) like some ot; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2016-03/msg00075.html (8,250 bytes)
12. Re: [VHFcontesting] IC9100? (score: 1): Author: "Mike (KA5CVH) Urich" <mike@ka5cvh.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:48:07 -0500; I've heard that some will use RG-174 between the radio and the transverter to help eliminate the overpowering the xvrtr. -- Mike Urich KA5CVH http://ka5cvh.com 100 watts and a wire. _________________; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2016-03/msg00076.html (7,798 bytes)
13. Re: [VHFcontesting] IC9100? (score: 1): Author: Jonesy W3DHJ via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:32:27 -0600 (MDT); Would also eliminate weak sigs from overpowering the receiver. Jonesy -- Marvin L Jones | W3DHJ | W3DHJ | http://W3DHJ.net/ Pueblo, Colorado | @ | Jonesy | __ 38.238N 104.547W | jonz.net | DM78rf | 7; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2016-03/msg00080.html (8,218 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]