Rather than speculate, it is interesting to see who this affects. January 2008 VHF contest, the first one with a Limited Rover entries: 1 station (out of 25), chose to include 1296 MHz instead of 222
Nice factual analysis Duffy, and thankfully lacking the unnecessary hysteria of earlier postings. 73, Mike K6NC Rather than speculate, it is interesting to see who this affects. January 2008 VHF cont
With about 3 active rovers total in the SF Bay Area, even if it affected 100% of them, we are not talking about a wide-spread impact. I have never understood why 97% of the comments on this reflector
Duffey, this may be a "regional" thing... but looking back at my 2006 and 2007 logs, I have FAR more contacts on 1.2 GHz around here than on 222. The fixed stations have 1296 here instead of 222. It
That should have read "Denver to Colorado Springs"... oops, wrong direction. South, not north! :-) If anyone can find a rover from Wyoming... let me know. Only a few of us go up there, and only long
Hey Nate - You might want to check those logs again. In 2006, it looks like WY0X/r had 23 QSOs on 222 MHz and 20 on 1296 MHz. In 2007, you had 23 contacts on 222 MHz and 15 on 1296 MHz. Now the diffe