Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+HORSE\s+\=\s+DEAD\.\s+Lather\,\s+rinse\,\s+repeat\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+HORSE\s+\=\s+DEAD\.\s+Lather\,\s+rinse\,\s+repeat\.\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] HORSE = DEAD. Lather, rinse, repeat. (score: 1): Author: kr7o@vhfdx.com; Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 10:03:52 -0800; With all the rehashed moaning on the VHF contesting, HF contesting, and Moon-net reflectors regarding this/that perceived contest problem I can't decide if I just want to unsubscribe from all of the; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-11/msg00065.html (9,197 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] HORSE = DEAD. Lather, rinse, repeat. (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>; Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:24:45 -0600 (CST); Yeah, it's deja vu all over again, isn't it? Constant arguments about whether you can use any number other than your year first licensed in HF Sweepstakes, whether you can leave out the callsign in t; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-11/msg00067.html (9,963 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] HORSE = DEAD. Lather, rinse, repeat. (score: 1): Author: k4gun@comcast.net; Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:50:21 +0000 (UTC); Well, it isn't for lack of trying. If nothing is accomplished, then that is a very sad statement about the VUAC. They made some very good steps forward when they came up with the 3 tier rover syste; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-11/msg00072.html (11,275 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]