Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Get\s+A\s+Grip\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Get\s+A\s+Grip\!\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Get A Grip! (score: 1): Author: KA0TP@aol.com (KA0TP@aol.com); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:21 2003; In a message dated 9/5/02 10:29:13 AM Pacific Daylight Time, kb1grs@joelweber.org writes: << Another thing to consider, if requiring participants to have a GPS is undesireable, would be to allow five; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01338.html (7,702 bytes)
2. [VHFcontesting] Get A Grip! (score: 1): Author: k2txb@dxcc.com (Russ Pillsbury); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:21 2003; Maybe having a GPS should be mandatory for all rovers (TIC). That way if you get stranded at the end of a dirt road at least you can tell the rescue squad where to look for you. And as a side issue t; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01339.html (10,117 bytes)
3. [VHFcontesting] Get A Grip! (score: 1): Author: k8jwt@ntelos.net (Jacob Tennant); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:21 2003; Along the lines of GPS/Rover ops. I was going to run a APRS tracker in the rover so that my wife could track me/see where I was at. However I was told by the ARRL contest sevtion that it would be con; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01340.html (11,915 bytes)
4. [VHFcontesting] Get A Grip! (score: 1): Author: k2txb@dxcc.com (Russ Pillsbury); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:21 2003; This comes under the heading of "don't ask". Whoever told you that was making sure that his answer could not come back to bite him (CYA). But it is ridiculous to say that a transmit only tracker is "; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01341.html (13,987 bytes)
5. [VHFcontesting] Get A Grip! (score: 1): Author: mph@swcp.com (Mike Hasselbeck); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:21 2003; Is the same true of repeaters? I know you're not allowed to solicit contacts via repeater, but what about letting the guys back home know where you are and are OK at least? Here in the southwest a r; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01342.html (8,499 bytes)
6. [VHFcontesting] Get A Grip! (score: 1): Author: kd7ts@ispwest.com (KD7TS); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:21 2003; Why is this thread running on TWO lists ?? Any way I've almost bitten through my tongue, but I have to respond to this: Jacob, et al NO NO NO, surely the rules are written and understood. They are no; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01343.html (8,639 bytes)
7. [VHFcontesting] Get A Grip! (score: 1): Author: kd7ts@ispwest.com (KD7TS); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:21 2003; OOPS K7CX would probably agree, but actually I was referring to K7XC; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01344.html (7,777 bytes)
8. [VHFcontesting] Get A Grip! (score: 1): Author: john@hays.org (John D. Hays); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:21 2003; I guess we need to make sure all of our street addresses are unlisted too, that way no one will know where the fixed stations are -- --Original Message-- From: owner-vhf@w6yx.stanford.edu [mailto:own; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01345.html (8,596 bytes)
9. [VHFcontesting] Get A Grip! (score: 1): Author: john@hays.org (John D. Hays); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:21 2003; Take a look at Idaho County, Idaho and try to figure out ZIP/Grid correlation .... --Original Message-- From: owner-vhf@w6yx.stanford.edu [mailto:owner-vhf@w6yx.stanford.edu]On Behalf Of KA0TP@aol.co; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01347.html (9,410 bytes)
10. [VHFcontesting] Get A Grip! (score: 1): Author: k2txb@dxcc.com (Russ Pillsbury); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:21 2003; But the questions is "Not allowed for what?" Certainly the intent of the rules in disallowing packet operations is for use for spotting nets. If he is using it only for tracking, that is not spotting; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01348.html (10,777 bytes)
11. [VHFcontesting] Get A Grip! (score: 1): Author: kb1grs@joelweber.org (Joel N. Weber II); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:21 2003; Did the person you talked to at the League understand that the APRS packets would be sent out in a form such that they wouldn't be digipeated? I'd always thought that the spirit of that rule was tha; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01350.html (8,966 bytes)
12. [VHFcontesting] Get A Grip! (score: 1): Author: geoiii@kkn.net (George Fremin III - K5TR); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:21 2003; If you know where they are - then by default you do know the beam heading. -- George Fremin III - K5TR geoiii@kkn.net http://www.kkn.net/~k5tr; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01351.html (8,204 bytes)
13. [VHFcontesting] Get A Grip! (score: 1): Author: geoiii@kkn.net (George Fremin III - K5TR); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:21 2003; My guess would be that this was seen as self spotting. By using APRS you are sending your call and location out. This is not really much diffrent than getting on a packet DX spotting system and putti; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01352.html (10,019 bytes)
14. [VHFcontesting] Get A Grip! (score: 1): Author: kharker@cs.utexas.edu (Kenneth E. Harker); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:21 2003; In the situation he describes, that is self-spotting. Traditionally, self-spotting has been seen as placing your callsign and your CQ frequency on a DX cluster. Blasting away continuously on APRS wit; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01353.html (12,029 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]