Author: Aa4zz via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2019 17:11:00 +0000 (UTC)
Is there current agreement on FT8 frequencies on the bands 2 meters and above? 73 Paul AA4ZZ _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com ht
Author: Buddy Morgan via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2019 18:23:08 +0000 (UTC)
Here in the Southeastern United States, for FT 8, we have agreed on and use, on a weekly basis: 144.174 432.174 1296.174 Somebody said that, a few years ago, somebody or another agreed on 222.065 for
Here in the PNW, we use 222.080 for digi although not a ton of activity. 73 .-James K7KQA DN06 _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com
Author: Buddy Morgan via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2019 01:22:49 +0000 (UTC)
Sounds good to me. As I said, I was told that somebody or another decreed the 222.065 frequency, a few years ago. How about: 144.174 222.174 432.174 902.174 1296.174 and so forth and so on... 144.174
Consistency is good. Separation of modes is good, too. Only question from me would be "does this work everywhere in ITU Region 2?" and if yes, does it also work in Regions 1 and 3? And, of course, at
Author: Buddy Morgan via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2019 18:20:51 +0000 (UTC)
If the frequencies are pre programmed in the software, people will use them. I think these frequencies work everywhere. But, I can't claim to know that for a fact. Buddy WB4OMG --Original Message-- F