Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+FT4\s+and\s+FT8\s+Contesting\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+FT4\s+and\s+FT8\s+Contesting\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] FT4 and FT8 Contesting (score: 1): Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 09:03:27 -0800; Log checking for several recent contests that used the FT4 and FT8 modes has shown undesirably large numbers of claimed QSOs that receive not-in-log ("NIL") status from the other station. The WSJT de; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2020-02/msg00033.html (7,949 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT4 and FT8 Contesting (score: 1): Author: John Kludt <johnnykludt@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 12:13:18 -0500; Ed, Interesting challenge. There is also a follow-up email that suggests much of it is about operator training on how to use a new mode in a contest. CW has been around for 100 years and SSB for 60 y; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2020-02/msg00035.html (8,815 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT4 and FT8 Contesting (score: 1): Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 09:31:19 -0800; Exactly. Ham radio communication uses an imperfect medium. There is no way to guarantee message receipt by the two QSO partners. This is the classic Two Generals Paradox discovered by the computer sc; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2020-02/msg00037.html (9,701 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]