Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+FT\s+897\s+performance\s+on\s+HF\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+FT\s+897\s+performance\s+on\s+HF\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] FT 897 performance on HF (score: 1): Author: "K5ZM" <k5zm@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 19:45:42 -0700; All, Curious. Of you '897 users who also use it HF, how many of you -if any- have experienced RX overload/de-sens problems while in an FD-type multi-rig environment? (As was the case in our K7AW FD e; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-07/msg00015.html (7,458 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT 897 performance on HF (score: 1): Author: "John Geiger" <ne0p@lcisp.com>; Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 02:52:19 -0000; Hi Ian, If you thought that the FT897 overloaded on HF, you definitely don't want a 706MKIIG. I was really disappointed in its receiver. Of the HF/VHF/UHF mini rigs, I have found that the FT100D had; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-07/msg00016.html (8,363 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]