Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Discussion\s+on\s+rules\s+from\s+one\s+rover\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Discussion\s+on\s+rules\s+from\s+one\s+rover\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Discussion on rules from one rover (score: 1): Author: jcplatt1@mmm.com; Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:03:55 -0600; Hello Marshall and all. Good to see an open discussion on rules .... in this case rover rules. Yes, this discussion can be tiring, but if we keep it civil and offer suggestions with pro's & cons it i; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-11/msg00074.html (10,722 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Discussion on rules from one rover (score: 1): Author: k4gun@comcast.net; Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 19:09:17 +0000 (UTC); I would be 100% in favor of both of your suggestions. Both are minor changes and would affect nobody other than the circle group. Every other station would either benefit or be unaffected. There i; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-11/msg00076.html (11,783 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] Discussion on rules from one rover (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <aa5jg@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:23:36 -0800 (PST); Not entirely correct. What about the limited rover who has been operating on 2m, 70cm, 23cm, and 13cm (or 33cm). They would no longer be permitted to enter as a limited rover even if that is the appr; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-11/msg00079.html (9,965 bytes)
4. Re: [VHFcontesting] Discussion on rules from one rover (score: 1): Author: k4gun@comcast.net; Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 19:43:04 +0000 (UTC); There are none that fall into that category. Take a look at the line scores for June and January and you'll see that only one station in RL would be affected and he's the guy with the circling group; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-11/msg00083.html (10,225 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]